Screening for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Adults: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force
- PMID: 31550037
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.10060
Screening for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Adults: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force
Abstract
Importance: Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria can identify patients for whom treatment might be beneficial for preventing symptomatic infection and other health outcomes.
Objective: To systematically review benefits and harms of asymptomatic bacteriuria screening and treatment in adults, including during pregnancy, to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Data sources: MEDLINE, PubMed (publisher-supplied records), and Cochrane Collaboration Central Registry of Controlled Trials; surveillance through May 24, 2019.
Study selection: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies on benefits and harms of screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria; RCTs on benefits and harms of asymptomatic bacteriuria treatment. Eligible populations included unselected, asymptomatic individuals without known urinary tract conditions.
Data extraction and synthesis: Independent critical appraisal and data abstraction by 2 reviewers. Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate benefits of the interventions.
Main outcomes and measures: Symptomatic infection; function, morbidity, mortality; pregnancy complications and birth outcomes.
Results: Nineteen studies (N = 8443) meeting inclusion criteria were identified. Two cohort studies (n = 5289) found fewer cases of pyelonephritis in the cohorts of screened pregnant women (0.5%) than within retrospective comparisons of unscreened cohorts (2.2% and 1.8%); the larger study estimated a statistically significant relative risk of 0.30 (95% CI, 0.15-0.60). No studies examined screening in nonpregnant populations. Among 12 trials of asymptomatic bacteriuria screening and treatment during pregnancy (n = 2377; 1 conducted within past 30 years), there were reduced rates of pyelonephritis (range, 0%-16.5% for the intervention group and 2.2%-36.4% for the control group; pooled risk ratio [RR], 0.24 [95% CI, 0.14-0.40]; 12 trials) and low birth weight (range, 2.5%-14.8% for the intervention group and 6.7%-21.4% for the control group; pooled RR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.46-0.90]; 7 trials). There was no significant difference in infant mortality (pooled RR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.29-3.26]; 6 trials). Five RCTs of asymptomatic bacteriuria treatment in nonpregnant adults (n = 777) did not report any significant differences in risk of infection, mobility, or mortality. Limited evidence on harms of screening or treatment was available, and no statistically significant differences were identified.
Conclusions and relevance: Screening and treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy was associated with reduced rates of pyelonephritis and low birth weights, but the available evidence was not current, with only 1 study conducted in the past 30 years. Benefits of asymptomatic bacteriuria treatment in nonpregnant adult populations were not found. Trial evidence on harms of asymptomatic bacteriuria antibiotic treatment was limited.
Similar articles
-
Screening for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Adults: An Updated Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2019 Sep. Report No.: 19-05252-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2019 Sep. Report No.: 19-05252-EF-1. PMID: 31573774 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Screening for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.JAMA. 2019 Sep 24;322(12):1188-1194. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.13069. JAMA. 2019. PMID: 31550038
-
Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in adults: evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation recommendation statement.Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jul 1;149(1):W20-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-1-200807010-00009-w1. Ann Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18591632 Review.
-
Benefits and harms of screening for and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy: a systematic review.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Nov 2;16(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1128-0. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016. PMID: 27806709 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Screening for Bacterial Vaginosis in Pregnant Adolescents and Women to Prevent Preterm Delivery: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1293-1309. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0233. JAMA. 2020. PMID: 32259235
Cited by
-
When urine testing to rule out infection does more harm than good.Can Fam Physician. 2024 Sep;70(9):551-554. doi: 10.46747/cfp.7009551. Can Fam Physician. 2024. PMID: 39271226 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Urine polymerase chain reaction tests: stewardship helper or hinderance?Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 Mar 6;4(1):e77. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.71. eCollection 2024. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024. PMID: 38721490 Free PMC article.
-
Clinico-microbiological Profile and Outcomes of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Pregnancy.Indian J Nephrol. 2024 Mar-Apr;34(2):134-138. doi: 10.4103/ijn.ijn_305_21. Epub 2023 Sep 29. Indian J Nephrol. 2024. PMID: 38681000 Free PMC article.
-
Endolysin EN572-5 as an alternative to treat urinary tract infection caused by Streptococcus agalactiae.Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024 Dec;108(1):79. doi: 10.1007/s00253-023-12949-8. Epub 2024 Jan 8. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024. PMID: 38189950 Free PMC article.
-
Reducing unnecessary urine culture testing in residents of long term care facilities.BMJ. 2023 Aug 9;382:e075566. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-075566. BMJ. 2023. PMID: 37558239 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
