Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
, 10, 1981
eCollection

Masked Speech Recognition in School-Age Children

Affiliations
Review

Masked Speech Recognition in School-Age Children

Lori J Leibold et al. Front Psychol.

Abstract

Children who are typically developing often struggle to hear and understand speech in the presence of competing background sounds, particularly when the background sounds are also speech. For example, in many cases, young school-age children require an additional 5- to 10-dB signal-to-noise ratio relative to adults to achieve the same word or sentence recognition performance in the presence of two streams of competing speech. Moreover, adult-like performance is not observed until adolescence. Despite ample converging evidence that children are more susceptible to auditory masking than adults, the field lacks a comprehensive model that accounts for the development of masked speech recognition. This review provides a synthesis of the literature on the typical development of masked speech recognition. Age-related changes in the ability to recognize phonemes, words, or sentences in the presence of competing background sounds will be discussed by considering (1) how masking sounds influence the sensory encoding of target speech; (2) differences in the time course of development for speech-in-noise versus speech-in-speech recognition; and (3) the central auditory and cognitive processes required to separate and attend to target speech when multiple people are speaking at the same time.

Keywords: children; development; hearing; masking; speech perception.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 1 article

References

    1. Abdala C. (2001). Maturation of the human cochlear amplifier: distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves recorded at low and high primary tone levels. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 1465–1476. 10.1121/1.1388018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alloway T., Gathercole S. E., Kirkwood H., Elliott J. (2008). Evaluating the validity of the automated working memory assessment. Educ. Psychol. 28, 725–734. 10.1080/01443410802243828 - DOI
    1. ANSI (2010). ANSI/ASA S12.60–2010 acoustical performance criteria, design requirements, and guidelines for schools, part 1: Permanent schools. New York, NY: American National Standards Institute.
    1. Baddeley A. D. (2000). “Short-term and working memory” in The Oxford handbook of memory. eds. Tulving E., FIM C., editors. (New York, NY: Oxford University Press; ), 77–92.
    1. Bargones J. Y., Werner L. A. W. (1994). Adults listen selectively; infants do not. Psychol. Sci. 5, 170–174.

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback