Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer
- PMID: 31553506
- DOI: 10.1002/pros.23908
Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer
Abstract
Background: Positive surgical margins (PSMs) represent a poor prognostic factor at radical prostatectomy (RP). To investigate the impact of PSM, its length, the focality, and the PSM Gleason, on biochemical recurrence (BCR) in organ-confined RP patients.
Methods: Within a high-volume center database, we identified patients who harbored organ-confined (pathologic stage T2 disease) prostate cancer (PCa) at RP (2010-2016). Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariable Cox regression models were used to test the effect of the PSM on the BCR risk.
Results: Overall, 8770 patients were identified. Of those, 6.6% (n = 579) harbored PSM. BCR-free survival at 72 months after RP was 77.7% vs 89.0% for patients with vs without PSM (P < .001). BCR-free survival rates at 72 months were 77.4% vs 73.6% (P = .1) for unifocal vs multifocal PSM, 77.2% vs 71.8% (P = .03) for Gleason pattern 3 vs ≥4 at the margin and 88.4% vs 66.3% (P < .001) for <3 vs ≥3 mm length of margin. In multivariable Cox models PSM was an independent predictor for BCR (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.40, P < .001). However, in subgroups with PSM, only ≥3 mm PSM represented an independent predictor (HR = 1.93, P = .04), while focality and Gleason at the margin were no significant predictors.
Conclusion: PSM represents an independent predictor for BCR in organ-confined PCa at RP. Moreover, Gleason ≥4 at the margin and ≥3 mm PSM length were associated with worse BCR-free survival. Closer surveillance of patients with organ-confined PCa at RP and PSM can help to identify those who qualify for early salvage radiotherapy.
Keywords: PSM; biochemical recurrence; positive surgical margin; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on oncologic outcomes in patients with nonorgan-confined prostate cancer.Prostate. 2022 Jun;82(9):949-956. doi: 10.1002/pros.24341. Epub 2022 Mar 28. Prostate. 2022. PMID: 35344221
-
Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018 Jun;21(2):221-227. doi: 10.1038/s41391-017-0019-4. Epub 2017 Dec 11. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018. PMID: 29230008
-
Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence.BJU Int. 2015 Oct;116 Suppl 3:42-8. doi: 10.1111/bju.13173. Epub 2015 Jul 27. BJU Int. 2015. PMID: 26218868
-
Radical prostatectomy: positive surgical margins matter.Urol Oncol. 2013 Oct;31(7):974-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.12.011. Epub 2012 Jan 11. Urol Oncol. 2013. PMID: 22244265 Review.
-
Prognostic Value of Gleason Score at Positive Surgical Margin in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 Oct;18(5):e517-e522. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 Mar 4. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32229268 Review.
Cited by
-
Length of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: Does size matter? - A systematic review and meta-analysis.Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023 Dec;26(4):673-680. doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00654-6. Epub 2023 Mar 1. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023. PMID: 36859711 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Novel PSMA-Targeted Probe for NIRF-Guided Surgery and Photodynamic Therapy: Synthesis and Preclinical Validation.Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Oct 25;23(21):12878. doi: 10.3390/ijms232112878. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. PMID: 36361667 Free PMC article.
-
Multiparametric MRI-based nomograms in predicting positive surgical margins of prostate cancer after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 12;12:973285. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.973285. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36172161 Free PMC article.
-
Clinicopathological Significances of Positive Surgical Resection Margin after Radical Prostatectomy for Prostatic Cancers: A Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 9;58(9):1251. doi: 10.3390/medicina58091251. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022. PMID: 36143928 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Effect of Adverse Surgical Margins on the Risk of Biochemical Recurrence after Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.Biomedicines. 2022 Aug 7;10(8):1911. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10081911. Biomedicines. 2022. PMID: 36009458 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
