Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Aug 28:6:289.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00289. eCollection 2019.

An Appraisal of Methods for Measuring Welfare of Grazing Ruminants

Affiliations
Review

An Appraisal of Methods for Measuring Welfare of Grazing Ruminants

Graham K Barrell. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Although disturbances in body function of animals can be measured to determine whether a state of stress may exist, there is growing interest in finding ways to assess their emotional status as an indicator of good or bad welfare status. Generally it is easier to determine poor states of well-being than positive ones. For grazing ruminants some indicators of well-being include absence of illness, good growth and productivity, and longevity. Motion detectors can provide automated remote monitoring of behavior and it is likely that there will be advances in the interpretation software to increase the utility of this technology for assessing well-being. Cortisol levels in body fluids, feces and pelage are prominent as a marker of poor animal welfare, but like many of the other objective measures that are used, are not wholly reliable at the individual animal level. These other measures include: plasma serotonin, heart rate variation, infra-red thermography, cytokines, salivary alpha amylase, and acute phase proteins. Use of automated facial expression recognition may supplement electrophysiological recording as means to quantify the pain experience of animals. Although the measures described in the literature do not necessarily provide the final answer for determination of welfare in grazing ruminants, they all have some merit and deserve further investigation.

Keywords: HPA axis; animal behavior; animal welfare; assessment of pain; ruminants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Moberg GP. A model for assessing the impact of behavioural stress on domestic animals. J Anim Sci. (1987) 65:1228–35. 10.2527/jas1987.6551228x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Broom DM, Johnson KG. Stress and Animal Welfare. London: Chapman and Hall; (1993).
    1. Broom DM. Assessing the welfare of modified or treated animals. Livest Prod Sci. (1993) 36:39–54. 10.1016/0301-6226(93)90136-6 - DOI
    1. Dawkins MS. La Souffrance Animale. Maisons-Alfort: Editions du Point Vétérinaire; (1983).
    1. Fraser D. Science, values and animal welfare: exploring the inextricable connection. Anim Welfare. (1995) 4:103–17.