Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 7 (4), e14993

Exploiting Machine Learning Algorithms and Methods for the Prediction of Agitated Delirium After Cardiac Surgery: Models Development and Validation Study

Affiliations

Exploiting Machine Learning Algorithms and Methods for the Prediction of Agitated Delirium After Cardiac Surgery: Models Development and Validation Study

Hani Nabeel Mufti et al. JMIR Med Inform.

Abstract

Background: Delirium is a temporary mental disorder that occasionally affects patients undergoing surgery, especially cardiac surgery. It is strongly associated with major adverse events, which in turn leads to increased cost and poor outcomes (eg, need for nursing home due to cognitive impairment, stroke, and death). The ability to foresee patients at risk of delirium will guide the timely initiation of multimodal preventive interventions, which will aid in reducing the burden and negative consequences associated with delirium. Several studies have focused on the prediction of delirium. However, the number of studies in cardiac surgical patients that have used machine learning methods is very limited.

Objective: This study aimed to explore the application of several machine learning predictive models that can pre-emptively predict delirium in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and compare their performance.

Methods: We investigated a number of machine learning methods to develop models that can predict delirium after cardiac surgery. A clinical dataset comprising over 5000 actual patients who underwent cardiac surgery in a single center was used to develop the models using logistic regression, artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), Bayesian belief networks (BBN), naïve Bayesian, random forest, and decision trees.

Results: Only 507 out of 5584 patients (11.4%) developed delirium. We addressed the underlying class imbalance, using random undersampling, in the training dataset. The final prediction performance was validated on a separate test dataset. Owing to the target class imbalance, several measures were used to evaluate algorithm's performance for the delirium class on the test dataset. Out of the selected algorithms, the SVM algorithm had the best F1 score for positive cases, kappa, and positive predictive value (40.2%, 29.3%, and 29.7%, respectively) with a P=.01, .03, .02, respectively. The ANN had the best receiver-operator area-under the curve (78.2%; P=.03). The BBN had the best precision-recall area-under the curve for detecting positive cases (30.4%; P=.03).

Conclusions: Although delirium is inherently complex, preventive measures to mitigate its negative effect can be applied proactively if patients at risk are prospectively identified. Our results highlight 2 important points: (1) addressing class imbalance on the training dataset will augment machine learning model's performance in identifying patients likely to develop postoperative delirium, and (2) as the prediction of postoperative delirium is difficult because it is multifactorial and has complex pathophysiology, applying machine learning methods (complex or simple) may improve the prediction by revealing hidden patterns, which will lead to cost reduction by prevention of complications and will optimize patients' outcomes.

Keywords: cardiac surgery; delirium; machine learning; predictive modeling.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver-operator curves (ROC) and precision-recall curves (PRC) for the training dataset using 10-fold cross-validation and test datasets. (A) ROC for training using 10-fold cross-validation. (B) ROC for test dataset. (C) PRC for training using 10-fold cross-validation. (D) PRC for test dataset. ANN: artificial neural networks; BBN: Bayesian belief networks; DT: J48 decision tree; LR: logistic regression; NB: naïve Bayesian; RF: random forest, SVM: support vector machines; P:N: positive to negative ratio.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Koster S, Oosterveld FG, Hensens AG, Wijma A, van der Palen J. Delirium after cardiac surgery and predictive validity of a risk checklist. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Dec;86(6):1883–7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.08.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. [2019-10-08]. STS National Database https://www.sts.org/registries-research-center/sts-national-database.
    1. American Psychiatric Association . Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Delirium. Washington, DC: American Psyciatric Assosiation; 2010.
    1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders. Fifth Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders : DSM-52013.
    1. Royston D, Cox F. Anaesthesia: the patient's point of view. Lancet. 2003 Nov 15;362(9396):1648–58. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14800-3. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback