Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 May 25;1(1):1-6.
doi: 10.23922/jarc.2016-010. eCollection 2017.

The present status and developments of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

The present status and developments of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

Takeo Sato et al. J Anus Rectum Colon. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer has been shown to be less invasive than open surgery, while maintaining a similar safety level in many clinical trials. Furthermore, there are no significant differences between laparoscopic surgery and open surgery with respect to the long-term outcomes in colon cancer. Thus, laparoscopic surgery has been accepted as one of the standard treatments for colon cancer. In addition, laparoscopic surgery has also achieved favorable outcomes in the treatments of rectal cancer, with many reports showing long-term outcomes comparable to those of open surgery. Furthermore, the magnification in laparoscopy improves visualization in the pelvic cavity and facilitates precise manipulation, as well as providing an excellent educational opportunity. Laparoscopic surgery may be an ideal approach for the treatment of rectal cancer and colon cancer. Recently, two trials showed that, among patients with advanced rectal cancer, the use of laparoscopic surgery as compared with open surgery confirmed to meet the criterion for non-inferiority for long-term outcomes. In addition, new techniques such as single-port and robotic surgery have been introduced for laparoscopic surgery in recent years.

Keywords: colorectal cancer; laparoscopic surgery; randomized controlled trial; robotic surgery; single-port surgery; total mesorectal excision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest The authors declare that there are no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Sep;1(3):144-50. - PubMed
    1. Watanabe M, Ohgami M, Teramoto T, Kitajima M. Laparoscopic local excision of the cecum for cecal creeping tumor. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997 Apr;7(2):144-7. - PubMed
    1. Maggiori L, Panis Y. Surgical management of IBD―from an open to a laparoscopic approach. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 May;10(5):297-306. - PubMed
    1. Zmora O, Gervaz P, Wexner SD. Trocar site recurrence in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2001 Aug;15(8):788-93. - PubMed
    1. Theophilus M, Platell C, Spilsbury K. Long-term survival following laparoscopic and open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Colorectal Dis. 2014 Mar;16(3):O75-81. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources