Transactional eHealth Literacy: Developing and Testing a Multi-Dimensional Instrument
- PMID: 31583963
- PMCID: PMC7366705
- DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2019.1666940
Transactional eHealth Literacy: Developing and Testing a Multi-Dimensional Instrument
Abstract
Theoretically informed measures of eHealth literacy that consider the social affordances of eHealth are limited. This study describes the psychometric testing of a multi-dimensional instrument to measure functional, communicative, critical, and translational eHealth literacies, as informed by the Transactional Model of eHealth Literacy (TMeHL). A 3-phase rating scale construction process was conducted to engage eHealth experts and end-users. In Phase 1, Experts (N = 5) and end-users (N = 25) identified operational behaviors to measure each eHealth literacy dimension. End-users (N = 10) participated in think-aloud interviews to provide feedback on items reviewed and approved by experts. A field test was conducted with a random sample of patients recruited from a university-based research registry (N = 283). Factor analyses and Rasch procedures examined the internal structure of the scores produced by each scale. Pearson's r correlations provided evidence for external validity of scores. The instrument measures four reliable (ω = .92-.96) and correlated (r= .44-.64) factors: functional (4 items), communicative (5 items), critical (5 items), and translational (4 items). Researchers and providers can use this new instrument as a theory-driven instrument to measure four eHealth literacies that are fundamental to the social affordances of the eHealth experience.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
eHealth Literacy Instruments: Systematic Review of Measurement Properties.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 15;23(11):e30644. doi: 10.2196/30644. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 34779781 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Proposing a Transactional Model of eHealth Literacy: Concept Analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 2;20(10):e10175. doi: 10.2196/10175. J Med Internet Res. 2018. PMID: 30279155 Free PMC article.
-
Validity Evidence of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) Part 2: Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluate Test Content, Response Process, and Internal Structure in the Australian Community Health Setting.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 8;24(3):e32777. doi: 10.2196/32777. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 35258475 Free PMC article.
-
A Psychometric Analysis of the Italian Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale Using Item Response and Classical Test Theory Methods.J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 11;19(4):e114. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6749. J Med Internet Res. 2017. PMID: 28400356 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric Properties of Patient-Facing eHealth Evaluation Measures: Systematic Review and Analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 11;19(10):e346. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7638. J Med Internet Res. 2017. PMID: 29021128 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Professionals Evaluating Clients' Suitability for Digital Health and Social Care: Scoping Review of Assessment Instruments.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 30;25:e51450. doi: 10.2196/51450. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 38032707 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve Digital Health Literacy in Forced Migrant Populations: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review.JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 2;12:e50798. doi: 10.2196/50798. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023. PMID: 37917139 Free PMC article.
-
Digital literacy as a new determinant of health: A scoping review.PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Oct 12;2(10):e0000279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000279. eCollection 2023 Oct. PLOS Digit Health. 2023. PMID: 37824584 Free PMC article.
-
Communicating about online health information with patients: Exploring determinants among telemental health providers.PEC Innov. 2023 Jun 9;2:100176. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100176. eCollection 2023 Dec. PEC Innov. 2023. PMID: 37384157 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of the transactional eHealth literacy instrument with cancer caregivers.PEC Innov. 2022 Aug 19;1:100075. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100075. eCollection 2022 Dec. PEC Innov. 2022. PMID: 37213773 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. (2015, June 25). Principles of Community Engagement. Retrieved from https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/communityengagement/index.html
-
- Anderson M, & Perrin A (2017, May 17). Technology use among seniors. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/05/17/technology-use-among-seniors/
-
- Barnlund D (1970). Communication: The Context of Change. Harper & Row.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical