Interfacility Transfer of Medicare Beneficiaries With Acute Type A Aortic Dissection and Regionalization of Care in the United States

Circulation. 2019 Oct 8;140(15):1239-1250. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038867. Epub 2019 Oct 7.

Abstract

Background: The feasibility and effectiveness of delaying surgery to transfer patients with acute type A aortic dissection-a catastrophic disease that requires prompt intervention-to higher-volume aortic surgery hospitals is unknown. We investigated the hypothesis that regionalizing care at high-volume hospitals for acute type A aortic dissections will lower mortality. We further decomposed this hypothesis into subparts, investigating the isolated effect of transfer and the isolated effect of receiving care at a high-volume versus a low-volume facility.

Methods: We compared the operative mortality and long-term survival between 16 886 Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with an acute type A aortic dissection between 1999 and 2014 who (1) were transferred versus not transferred, (2) underwent surgery at high-volume versus low-volume hospitals, and (3) were rerouted versus not rerouted to a high-volume hospital for treatment. We used a preference-based instrumental variable design to address unmeasured confounding and matching to separate the effect of transfer from volume.

Results: Between 1999 and 2014, 40.5% of patients with an acute type A aortic dissection were transferred, and 51.9% received surgery at a high-volume hospital. Interfacility transfer was not associated with a change in operative mortality (risk difference, -0.69%; 95% CI, -2.7% to 1.35%) or long-term mortality. Despite delaying surgery, a regionalization policy that transfers patients to high-volume hospitals was associated with a 7.2% (95% CI, 4.1%-10.3%) absolute risk reduction in operative mortality; this association persisted in the long term (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.87). The median distance needed to reroute each patient to a high-volume hospital was 50.1 miles (interquartile range, 12.4-105.4 miles).

Conclusions: Operative and long-term mortality were substantially reduced in patients with acute type A aortic dissection who were rerouted to high-volume hospitals. Policy makers should evaluate the feasibility and benefits of regionalizing the surgical treatment of acute type A aortic dissection in the United States.

Keywords: aneurysm, dissecting; causality; confounding factors, epidemiology; epidemiology; patient transfer; surgery.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aorta / pathology
  • Aorta / surgery
  • Aortic Aneurysm / diagnosis
  • Aortic Aneurysm / mortality*
  • Aortic Aneurysm / surgery
  • Aortic Dissection / diagnosis
  • Aortic Dissection / mortality*
  • Aortic Dissection / surgery
  • Cohort Studies
  • Female
  • Hospital Mortality / trends
  • Hospitals, High-Volume* / trends
  • Hospitals, Low-Volume / methods*
  • Hospitals, Low-Volume / trends
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Medicare* / trends
  • Patient Transfer / methods*
  • Patient Transfer / trends
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Survival Rate / trends
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United States / epidemiology