The Accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Algorithm for Screening to Detect Major Depression: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 31593971
- PMCID: PMC6960351
- DOI: 10.1159/000502294
The Accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Algorithm for Screening to Detect Major Depression: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: Screening for major depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) can be done using a cutoff or the PHQ-9 diagnostic algorithm. Many primary studies publish results for only one approach, and previous meta-analyses of the algorithm approach included only a subset of primary studies that collected data and could have published results.
Objective: To use an individual participant data meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of two PHQ-9 diagnostic algorithms for detecting major depression and compare accuracy between the algorithms and the standard PHQ-9 cutoff score of ≥10.
Methods: Medline, Medline In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, PsycINFO, Web of Science (January 1, 2000, to February 7, 2015). Eligible studies that classified current major depression status using a validated diagnostic interview.
Results: Data were included for 54 of 72 identified eligible studies (n participants = 16,688, n cases = 2,091). Among studies that used a semi-structured interview, pooled sensitivity and specificity (95% confidence interval) were 0.57 (0.49, 0.64) and 0.95 (0.94, 0.97) for the original algorithm and 0.61 (0.54, 0.68) and 0.95 (0.93, 0.96) for a modified algorithm. Algorithm sensitivity was 0.22-0.24 lower compared to fully structured interviews and 0.06-0.07 lower compared to the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Specificity was similar across reference standards. For PHQ-9 cutoff of ≥10 compared to semi-structured interviews, sensitivity and specificity (95% confidence interval) were 0.88 (0.82-0.92) and 0.86 (0.82-0.88).
Conclusions: The cutoff score approach appears to be a better option than a PHQ-9 algorithm for detecting major depression.
Keywords: Depression; Diagnostic accuracy; Meta-analysis; Patient Health Questionnaire-9; Screening.
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression: individual participant data meta-analysis.BMJ. 2019 Apr 9;365:l1476. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1476. BMJ. 2019. PMID: 30967483 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for screening to detect major depression: updated systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.BMJ. 2021 Oct 5;375:n2183. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2183. BMJ. 2021. PMID: 34610915 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of the PHQ-2 Alone and in Combination With the PHQ-9 for Screening to Detect Major Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2290-2300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6504. JAMA. 2020. PMID: 32515813 Free PMC article.
-
A diagnostic meta-analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) algorithm scoring method as a screen for depression.Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015 Jan-Feb;37(1):67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Sep 23. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015. PMID: 25439733 Review.
-
Screening and case finding for major depressive disorder using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis.Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015 Nov-Dec;37(6):567-76. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jun 18. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015. PMID: 26195347 Review.
Cited by
-
Depression and associated factors among Brazilian adults: the 2019 national healthcare population-based study.BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 28;23(1):704. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05133-9. BMC Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 37770824 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of a predictive model for depression risk in the U.S. adult population: Evidence from the 2007-2014 NHANES.BMC Psychol. 2023 Aug 25;11(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01278-0. BMC Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37620859 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of biological, psychological, and social factors on maternal depressive symptoms in late pregnancy: a cross-sectional study.Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 6;14:1181132. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1181132. eCollection 2023. Front Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 37346902 Free PMC article.
-
Trends of Prevalence Estimates and Risk Factors of Depressive Symptoms among Healthcare Workers Over one Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2022 Jun 30;18:e174501792206160. doi: 10.2174/17450179-v18-e2206160. eCollection 2022. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2022. PMID: 37274865 Free PMC article.
-
A propensity score matching study: The prevalence of mental health problems among pregnant women at first antenatal care increased in Chongqing during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 14;11:1142461. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1142461. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37124799 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Raffle A, Gray M. Screening: evidence and practice. London (UK): Oxford University Press; 2007.
-
- Wilson JM, Jungner G. Principles and practices of screening for disease. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1968.
-
- Fava GA, Tomba E, Sonino N. Clinimetrics: the science of clinical measurements. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66(1):11–15. - PubMed
-
- Fava GA, Carrozzino D, Lindberg L, Tomba E. The clinimetric approach to psychological assessment: a tribute to Per Bech, MD (1942-2018). Psychother Psychosom. 2018;87(6):321–326. - PubMed
-
- Tomba E, Bech P. Clinimetrics and clinical psychometrics: macro- and micro-analysis. Psychother Psychosom. 2012;81(6):333–343. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- R36 HS018246/HS/AHRQ HHS/United States
- R34 MH072925/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R01 MH069666/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R01 MH073687/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- TL1 RR024135/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- MR/J000914/1/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- F30 MH096664/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- MRF_C0396/MRF/MRF/United Kingdom
- R01 HL079235/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- R49 CE002093/CE/NCIPC CDC HHS/United States
- R34 MH084673/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- P30 DK050456/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- T37 MD001449/MD/NIMHD NIH HHS/United States
- T32 GM007356/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States
- K02 MH065919/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R24 MH071604/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
