Objectives: To evaluate the impact of octreotide on time to resolution of chylothorax compared with conventional therapy. Secondary outcomes include the following: time to reduction of chest tube output by 20%, additional surgeries for chylothorax, hospital length of stay, in-hospital mortality, and adverse drug reactions.
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of octreotide vs conventional therapy for treatment postoperative chylothorax in pediatric patients in the cardiac ICU following surgery for congenital heart disease between October 2008 and June 2017.
Results: Final analysis included 32 patients with chylothorax who met inclusion criteria. Patients who received octreotide had a longer duration of chest tube drainage than those who received conventional therapy (24 vs 9 days, p < 0.001). Resolution of chylothorax was achieved in 13 of 16 (81.3%) octreotide patients and 16 of 16 (100%) conventional patients (p = 0.178). There was a comparable time to reduction by 20% in drainage (6 vs 8 days, p = 0.337). There was no significant correlation between time after starting conventional management and reduction chylous output in either the octreotide or conventional therapy group (p = 0.809, p = 0.107, respectively). However, there was a significant and moderate correlation between octreotide and reduction in a chylous output following initiation of octreotide (R 2 = 0.464, p = 0.021).
Conclusions: Octreotide is potentially a safe and effective therapy for treatment in pediatric patients with refractory chylothorax following surgery for congenital heart disease.
Keywords: acquired chylothorax; chylothorax; congential heart disease; octreotide; pediatric; refractory chylothorax.
Copyright Published by the Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group. All rights reserved. For permissions, email: matthew.helms@ppag.org 2019.