Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Sep 3;4(9):533-540.
doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.190008. eCollection 2019 Sep.

Quality of Life After Amputation in Patients With Advanced Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

Quality of Life After Amputation in Patients With Advanced Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Brijesh Ayyaswamy et al. EFORT Open Rev. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

The majority of included studies (8 out of 11, n = 54) supported the concept of considering amputation for selected, unresponsive cases of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) as a justifiable alternative to an unsuccessful multimodality nonoperative option.Of patients who underwent amputation, 66% experienced improvement in quality of life (QOL) and 37% were able to use a prosthesis, 16% had an obvious decline in QOL and for 12% of patients, no clear details were given, although it was suggested by authors that these patients also encountered deterioration after amputation.Complications of phantom limb pain, recurrence of CRPS and stump pain were predominant risks and were noticed in 65%, 45% and 30% of cases after amputation, respectively and two-thirds of patients were satisfied.Amputation can be considered by clinicians and patients as an option to improve QOL and to relieve agonizing, excruciating pain of severe, resistant CRPS at a specialized centre after multidisclipinary involvement but it must be acknowledged that evidence is limited, and the there are risks of aggravating or recurrence of CRPS, phantom pain and unpredictable consequences of rehabilitation.Amputation, if considered for resistant CRPS, should be carried out at specialist centres and after MDT involvement before and after surgery. It should only be considered if requested by patients with poor quality of life who have failed to improve after multiple treatment modalities.Further high quality and comprehensive research is needed to understand the severe form of CRPS which behaves differently form less severe stages. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:533-540. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.190008.

Keywords: CRPS; amputation; complications; criteria; pain; phantom pain; quality of life.

Conflict of interest statement

ICMJE Conflict of interest statement: The author declares no conflict of interest relevant to this work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flowchart for study selection.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Quality of life (QOL) after amputation due to complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Comparison of good quality studies, low quality studies and combined results of all studies.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Resmini G, Ratti C, Canton G, Murena L, Moretti A, Iolascon G. Treatment of complex regional pain syndrome. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 2015;12:26–30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goh E, Chidambaram S, Ma D. Complex regional pain syndrome: a recent update. Burns Trauma 2017;5:2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bodde MI, Dijkstra PU, den Dunnen WF, Geertzen JH. Therapy-resistant complex regional pain syndrome type I: to amputate or not? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93:1799–1805. - PubMed
    1. Veldman PH, Reynen HM, Arntz IE, Goris RJ. Signs and symptoms of reflex sympathetic dystrophy: prospective study of 829 patients. Lancet 1993;342(8878):1012–1016. - PubMed
    1. Galer BS, Bruehl S, Harden RN; International Association for the Study of Pain. IASP diagnostic criteria for complex regional pain syndrome: a preliminary empirical validation study. Clin J Pain 1998;14:48–54. - PubMed
Feedback