Background: Ventricular bipolar voltage values <0.5 and <1.0/1.5 mV (epi- and endocardium) correlating with dense scar and border zone, respectively, were established using a 3.5-mm tip catheter. Novel microelectrode catheters promise improved mapping resolution; however, whether standard voltage criteria apply to catheters with smaller electrode size and interelectrode distance remains unclear.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether traditional bipolar voltage criteria for scar apply during substrate mapping with a microelectrode catheter.
Methods: Paired bipolar and microbipolar voltage values were acquired from control swine (n = 2) using the microelectrode catheter and assessed for systemic differences. In a postinfarction swine model (n = 6), scar characteristics were compared between the bipolar maps and microbipolar maps using both standard and adjusted voltage criteria derived from the control animals.
Results: In control swine, although 5th percentile values for bipolar and microbipolar voltage were similar (1.12 vs 1.22 mV [left ventricular (LV) endo]; 0.88 mV vs 0.98 mV [epi]), median values were significantly greater when acquired by microbipolar electrodes (3.60 vs 6.76 mV, P = .002 [LV endo]; 2.61 vs 2.72 mV, P = .02 [epi]). Microbipolar values were systematically larger by 2.0× and 1.4× in the LV endocardium and epicardium, respectively. Application of standard voltage values to microbipolar maps in postinfarct swine underestimated scar area by approximately 41% in the LV endocardium (13.7 vs 33.4 cm2, P = .004).
Conclusion: Bipolar voltage values acquired from microelectrodes are systemically larger than those acquired from standard catheters. New reference values should be established for these novel catheters.
Keywords: Electroanatomic mapping; High-density mapping; Microelectrode catheter; Myocardial infarction; Ventricular arrhythmia; Voltage mapping.
Copyright © 2019 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.