Capturing the patient voice: implementing patient-reported outcomes across the health system
- PMID: 31606809
- PMCID: PMC6995985
- DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02320-8
Capturing the patient voice: implementing patient-reported outcomes across the health system
Abstract
Purpose: Supporting the capture and use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at the point-of-care enriches information about important clinical and quality of life outcomes. Yet the ability to scale PROs across healthcare systems has been limited by knowledge gaps around how to manage the diversity of PRO uses and leverage health information technology. In this study, we report learnings and practice insights from UW Medicine's practice transformation efforts to incorporate patient voice into multiple areas of care.
Methods: Using a participatory, action research approach, we engaged with UW Medicine clinical and administrative stakeholders experienced with PRO implementation to inventory PRO implementations across the health system, characterize common clinical uses for PROs, and develop recommendations for system-wide governance and implementation of PROs.
Results: We identified a wide breadth of PRO implementations (n = 14) in practice and found that nearly half (47%) of employed PRO measures captured shared clinical domains (e.g., depression). We developed three vignettes (use cases) that illustrate how users interact with PROs, characterize common ways PRO implementations support clinical care across the health system (1) Preventive care, (2) Chronic/Specialty care, and (3) Surgical/Interventional care), and elucidate opportunities to enhance efficient PRO implementations through system-level standards and governance.
Conclusions: Practice transformation efforts increasingly require integration of the patient voice into clinical care, often through the use of PROs. Learnings from our work highlight the importance of proactively considering how PROs will be used across the layers of healthcare organizations to optimize the design and governance of PROs.
Keywords: Action research; Care transformation; Depression; Implementation; Patient engagement; Patient-reported outcomes.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors do not have any personal, professional, or financial conflicts of interest to disclose for this work. The authors did not work with or were otherwise influenced by any external sponsors for this work.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Advancing the use of patient-reported outcomes in practice: understanding challenges, opportunities, and the potential of health information technology.Qual Life Res. 2019 Jun;28(6):1575-1583. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02112-0. Epub 2019 Jan 25. Qual Life Res. 2019. PMID: 30684149
-
Integrating the use of patient-reported outcomes for both clinical practice and performance measurement: views of experts from 3 countries.Milbank Q. 2014 Dec;92(4):754-75. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12091. Milbank Q. 2014. PMID: 25492603 Free PMC article.
-
A catalyst for transforming health systems and person-centred care: Canadian national position statement on patient-reported outcomes.Curr Oncol. 2020 Apr;27(2):90-99. doi: 10.3747/co.27.6399. Epub 2020 May 1. Curr Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32489251 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Medical Care.Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018 May 23;38:122-134. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_200383. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018. PMID: 30231381 Review.
-
Strategies for incorporating patient-reported outcomes in the care of people with chronic kidney disease (PRO kidney): a protocol for a realist synthesis.Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 12;8(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0911-6. Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30636637 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The association of diabetes mellitus and routinely collected patient-reported outcomes in patients with cancer. A real-world cohort study.Cancer Med. 2024 Oct;13(20):e70246. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70246. Cancer Med. 2024. PMID: 39445809 Free PMC article.
-
General population normative values for the EORTC QLQ-C30 by age, sex, and health condition for the French general population.J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 May 2;8(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00719-7. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024. PMID: 38695992 Free PMC article.
-
The first steps in the development of a cancer-specific patient-reported experience measure item bank (PREM-item bank): towards dynamic evaluation of experiences.Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jan 12;32(2):100. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08266-5. Support Care Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38214761 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The implementation, use and impact of patient reported outcome measures in value-based healthcare programmes: A scoping review.PLoS One. 2023 Dec 6;18(12):e0290976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290976. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 38055759 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Is There Room for Individual Patient-Specified Preferences in the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Revolution?J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2023 Nov 27;10(4):210-218. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.2017. eCollection 2023 Fall. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2023. PMID: 38046995 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2019). Person and Family Engagement Strategy, 2018. Retrieved August 20, 2019, from https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Inst....
-
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2019). Promoting interoperability.
-
- National Quality Forum. (2018). NQF: Patient-reported outcomes. Retrieved August 20, 2018, from https://www.qualityforum.org/Patient-Reported_Outcomes.aspx.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
