Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is an exaggerated defense response of the body to a noxious stressor (infection, trauma, surgery, acute inflammation, ischemia or reperfusion, or malignancy to name a few) to localize and then eliminate the endogenous or exogenous source of the insult. It involves the release of acute-phase reactants which are direct mediators of widespread autonomic, endocrine, hematological and immunological alteration in the subject. Even though the purpose is defensive, the dysregulated cytokine storm has the potential to cause massive inflammatory cascade leading to reversible or irreversible end-organ dysfunction and even death. SIRS with a suspected source of infection is termed sepsis. Confirmation of infection with positive cultures is therefore not mandatory, at least in the early stages. Sepsis with one or more end-organ failure is called severe sepsis and with hemodynamic instability in spite of intravascular volume repletion is called septic shock. Together they represent a physiologic continuum with progressively worsening balance between pro and anti-inflammatory responses of the body. The American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine-sponsored sepsis definitions consensus conference also identified the entity of Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) as the presence of altered organ function in acutely ill septic patients such that homeostasis is not maintainable without intervention. Objectively, SIRS is defined by the satisfaction of any two of the criteria below – In the pediatric population, the definition is modified to a mandatory requirement of abnormal leukocyte count or temperature to establish the diagnosis, as abnormal heart rate and respiratory rates are more common in children. To summarize, almost all septic patients have SIRS, but not all SIRS patients are septic. Kaukonen et al. explained exceptions to this theory by suggesting that there are subgroups of hospitalized patients particularly at extremes of age who do not meet criteria for SIRS on presentation but progress to severe infection and multiple organ dysfunction and death. Establishing laboratory indices to identify such subgroup of patients along with the clinical criteria that we currently rely upon has been therefore gaining prominence over the recent years. Several scores exist to assess the severity of organ system damage. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) score version II and III, Multiple organ dysfunction (MOD) score, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and logistic organ dysfunction (LOD) score are to name a few. HISTORY With the advent of new concepts in pathophysiology and therapeutic interventions for sepsis in the early 90s, there was an increasing need to identify a homogenous group of potential subjects for clinical trials investigating new innovative therapeutic strategies. Borne out of the plethora of emerging studies, one opinion was unanimous. An early, time-sensitive approach to diagnosis and intervention is necessary to have a significant impact on patient survival and morbidity. Identifying the subjects at any setting with easy to use standardized parameters, therefore, held the key. The American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine-sponsored sepsis definitions consensus conference held in Chicago, Illinois on August 1991 aimed at establishing a standard group of clinical parameters to identify those subjects easily in any clinical setting. Thus was born the SIRS definition. It underwent further modification in the second chapter of the meeting in 2001 in Washington, DC. This conference proposed a conceptual framework of the staging of sepsis using the PIRO acronym (predisposition, insult or infection, response, and organ dysfunction). The goal of the initial definition was to be highly sensitive using easily available parameters across all healthcare settings. An unavoidable corollary of such a definition was, therefore, the lack of specificity. A few more relevant pitfalls of the SIRS definition, as has been pointed out in the literature, include the following: Kaukonen et al. in their study of over 130000 septic patients established that one out of eight patients in their observational study of sepsis did not have two or more SIRS criteria. Also, they also established that each criterion in the SIRS definition does not translate to an equivalent risk of organ dysfunction or death. In the wake of this debate, in 2016, the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) created a task force that proposed Sepsis-3, a new definition for sepsis. The new definition excluded the establishment of SIRS criteria to define sepsis and made it more nonspecific as any life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by the dysregulated host response to infection. The task force claimed that sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) has a better predictive validity for sepsis than SIRS criteria. It has better prognostic accuracy and ability to predict in-hospital mortality. To reduce the complexity of calculating SOFA, they introduced q SOFA. Q SOFA 3 component assessment system with: Although the validity of q SOFA, is limited in an ICU setting, it has consistently outperformed SIRS criteria in the prediction of organ dysfunction in a non ICU and ER setting. The use of vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, and aggressive therapeutic interventions in ICU limit the efficacy of q SOFA. Interestingly Hague et al. in their study of the utility of SIRS criteria in gastrointestinal surgery, patients also found it to be a useful criterion to identify postoperative complications.
Copyright © 2020, StatPearls Publishing LLC.
Bacterial SepsisB Bullock et al. PMID 30725739. - ReviewBacterial sepsis is a life-threatening condition that arises when the body’s response to an infection injures its tissues and organs. Sepsis has recently been re-defined …
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019A Labib. Qatar Med J 2019 (2), 4. PMID 31763206.Background: Sepsis, a medical emergency and life-threatening disorder, results from abnormal host response to infection that leads to acute organ dysfunction1 …
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)CW Seymour et al. JAMA 315 (8), 762-74. PMID 26903335.Among ICU encounters with suspected infection, the predictive validity for in-hospital mortality of SOFA was not significantly different than the more complex LODS but wa …
American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference Definitions of the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and Allied Disorders in Relation to Critically Injured PatientsDJ Muckart et al. Crit Care Med 25 (11), 1789-95. PMID 9366759.The current definitions of SIRS, sepsis, and related disorders in critically injured patients without head trauma show a significant association with physiologic deterior …
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)M Singer et al. JAMA 315 (8), 801-10. PMID 26903338.These updated definitions and clinical criteria should replace previous definitions, offer greater consistency for epidemiologic studies and clinical trials, and facilita …