Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Oct 17;14(10):e0223564.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223564. eCollection 2019.

A Systematic Review of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Oncology: Psychological and Physical Effects of Manipulative and Body-Based Practices

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Meta-Analysis

A Systematic Review of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Oncology: Psychological and Physical Effects of Manipulative and Body-Based Practices

Nicolas Calcagni et al. PLoS One. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Complementary and Alternative Medicines (CAM) are widely used by cancer patients, despite limited evidence of efficacy. Manipulative and body-based practices are some of the most commonly used CAM. This systematic review evaluates their benefits in oncology.

Method: A systematic literature review was carried out with no restriction of language, time, cancer location or type. PubMed, CENTRAL, PsycArticle, PsychInfo, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection and SOCindex were queried. Inclusion criteria were adult cancer patients and randomized controlled trials (RCT) assessing manipulative and body-based complementary practices on psychological and symptom outcomes. Effect size was calculated when applicable.

Results: Of 1624 articles retrieved, 41 articles were included: massage (24), reflexology (11), acupressure (6). Overall, 25 studies showed positive and significant effects on symptom outcomes (versus 9 that did not), especially pain and fatigue. Mixed outcomes were found for quality of life (8 papers finding a significant effect vs. 10 which did not) and mood (14 papers vs. 13). In most studies, there was a high risk of bias with a mean Jadad score of 2, making interpretation of results difficult.

Conclusion: These results seem to indicate that manipulative CAM may be effective on symptom management in cancer. However, more robust methodologies are needed. The methodological requirements of randomized controlled trials are challenging, and more informative results may be provided by more pragmatic study design.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow diagram of included studies.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Buzyn A. Le Plan cancer 2014–2019: un plan de lutte contre les inégalités et les pertes de chance face à la maladie. Les Tribunes De La Santé 2014;43:53.
    1. Wang T, Molassiotis A, Chung BPM, Tan J-Y. Unmet care needs of advanced cancer patients and their informal caregivers: a systematic review. BMC Palliative Care 2018;17 10.1186/s12904-018-0346-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scott E, Jewell A. Supportive care needs of people with pancreatic cancer: a literature review. Cancer Nursing Practice 2019. 10.7748/cnp.2019.e1566 - DOI
    1. Kotronoulas G, Papadopoulou C, Burns-Cunningham K, Simpson M, Maguire R. A systematic review of the supportive care needs of people living with and beyond cancer of the colon and/or rectum. European Journal of Oncology Nursing 2017;29:60–70. 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.05.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. About us [Internet]. World Health Organization. 2018 [cited 5 April 2018]. http://www.who.int/traditional-complementary-integrative-medicine/about/en/2

Publication types

Grant support

This research was funded by the French ‘Site de Recherche Intégrée sur le Cancer - Bordeaux Recherche Intégrée en Oncologie’ (SIRIC – BRIO, https://siric-brio.com), which brings together multidisciplinary research teams working in synergy to produce new knowledge for the benefit of patients. NC received the funding. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Feedback