Mastectomy in Transgender and Cisgender Patients: A Comparative Analysis of Epidemiology and Postoperative Outcomes

Nicholas G Cuccolo; Christine O Kang; Elizabeth R Boskey; Ahmed M S Ibrahim; Louise L Blankensteijn; Amir Taghinia; Bernard T Lee; Samuel J Lin; Oren Ganor

doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000002316

Mastectomy in Transgender and Cisgender Patients: A Comparative Analysis of Epidemiology and Postoperative Outcomes

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Jun 12;7(6):e2316. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002316. eCollection 2019 Jun.

Authors

Nicholas G Cuccolo¹, Christine O Kang¹, Elizabeth R Boskey¹, Ahmed M S Ibrahim², Louise L Blankensteijn², Amir Taghinia¹, Bernard T Lee², Samuel J Lin², Oren Ganor¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Plastic and Oral Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
² Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Abstract

Background: Mastectomy is a commonly requested procedure in the transmasculine population and has been shown to improve quality of life, although there is limited research on safety. The aim of this study was to provide a nationwide assessment of epidemiology and postoperative outcomes following masculinizing mastectomy and compare them with outcomes following mastectomy for cancer prophylaxis and gynecomastia correction in cisgender patients.

Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005 to 2017 was queried using International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes to create cohorts of mastectomies for 3 indications: transmasculine chest reconstruction, cancer risk-reduction (CRRM), and gynecomastia treatment (GM). Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications were compared between the 3 cohorts. Multivariable regression analysis was used to control for confounders.

Results: A total of 4,170 mastectomies were identified, of which 14.8% (n = 591) were transmasculine, 17.6% (n = 701) were CRRM, and 67.6% (n = 2,692) were GM. Plastic surgeons performed the majority of transmasculine cases (85.3%), compared with the general surgeons in the CRRM (97.9%) and GM (73.7%) cohorts. All-cause complication rates in the transmasculine, CRRM, and GM cohorts were 4.7%, 10.4%, and 3.7%, respectively. After controlling for confounding variables, transgender males were not at an increased risk for all-cause or wound complications. Multivariable regression identified BMI as a predictor of all-cause and wound complications.

Conclusion: Mastectomy is a safe and efficacious procedure for treating gender dysphoria in the transgender male, with an acceptable and reassuring complication profile similar to that seen in cisgender patients who approximate either the natal sex characteristics or the new hormonal environment.