Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 14 (10), e0223885
eCollection

The Feasibility of a Behavioral Group Intervention After Weight-Loss Surgery: A Randomized Pilot Trial

Affiliations

The Feasibility of a Behavioral Group Intervention After Weight-Loss Surgery: A Randomized Pilot Trial

Michelle R Lent et al. PLoS One.

Abstract

Background: Formal psychosocial support programs after weight-loss surgery are limited in scope and availability.

Objective: This randomized pilot study evaluated the feasibility of a postoperative behavioral intervention program.

Materials and methods: Postoperative weight-loss surgery patients (N = 50) were recruited from February 2017-July 2017 and randomized to a four-month behavioral program or usual care wait-list. Outcomes evaluated in addition to feasibility included health-related quality of life (Short Form -36), psychosocial functioning and adherence. Secondary outcomes included within-group changes for each outcome.

Results: Out of eight possible sessions, intervention participants attended a mean of 4.2 sessions. Intervention group participants experienced greater improvements in the social functioning domain of health-related quality of life compared to usual care. Self-reported dietary adherence in the intervention group remained stable, while usual care group dietary adherence declined. Within the intervention group, participants also reported gains in the physical function, pain and general health aspects of quality life from baseline to post-treatment. No differences in weight, mood or other eating behaviors (e.g., loss of control, emotional eating) were evident between groups.

Conclusion: Though participation in a postoperative behavioral intervention varied, the program helped participants to maintain aspects of quality of life and self-reported adherence to dietary recommendations.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03092479.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Participant flow CONSORT diagram.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, Jensen MD, Pories W, Fahrbach K, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292(14):1724–37. 10.1001/jama.292.14.1724 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mechanick JI, Youdim A, Jones DB, Timothy Garvey W, Hurley DL, Molly McMahon M, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient—2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(2):159–91. 10.1016/j.soard.2012.12.010 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Livhits M, Mercado C, Yermilov I, Parikh JA, Dutson E, Mehran A, et al. Preoperative predictors of weight loss following bariatric surgery: systematic review. Obes Surg. 2012;22(1):70–89. 10.1007/s11695-011-0472-4 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Herpertz S, Kielmann R, Wolf AM, Hebebrand J, Senf W. Do Psychosocial Variables Predict Weight Loss or Mental Health after Obesity Surgery? A Systematic Review. Obesity Research. 2004;12(10):1554–69. 10.1038/oby.2004.195 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kalarchian MA, Marcus MD. Psychosocial Interventions Pre and Post Bariatric Surgery. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2015;23(6):457–62. 10.1002/erv.2392 . - DOI - PubMed

Associated data

Grant support

FUNDING: This research was supported by a grant from Geisinger (MRL and LKC), SRC-L-54. The funder had no role in study design, data collection or analysis, interpretation, or dissemination of study findings. https://www.geisinger.edu/research/research-and-innovation/resources.
Feedback