Background: Chronic pain is a prevalent health concern in the United States (US) and a frequent reason for patients to seek primary care. The challenges associated with developing effective pain management strategies can be perceived as a burden on the patient-provider relationship.
Objective: This study explored the relationship between patients' overall satisfaction with their primary care providers (PCPs) and their satisfaction with their chronic pain treatment, as well as the provider behaviors that contributed to chronic pain patients' satisfaction with their PCPs.
Design: Concurrent nested mixed-methods design PARTICIPANTS: 97 patients with chronic pain who were assigned to the usual care arm of the Pain Program for Active Coping and Training (PPACT) study.
Approach: We analyzed phone interview and survey data (n = 97). Interviews assessed provider behaviors that led to patient satisfaction. Interview transcripts were analyzed based on a content analysis approach. Survey responses assessed patient satisfaction with primary care and pain services. We calculated a Pearson's correlation coefficient using five response categories.
Key results: Interviews revealed that high satisfaction with primary care was driven by five concrete PCP behaviors: (1) listening, (2) maintaining communication with patients, (3) acting as an access point to comprehensive pain care, (4) providing an honest assessment of the possibilities of pain care, and (5) taking time during consultations with patients. In surveys, participants reported higher satisfaction with their primary care services than with the pain services they received; these variables were only moderately correlated (r = 0.586).
Conclusions: Results suggest that patients with chronic pain can view the relationship with their PCPs as positive, even in the face of low satisfaction with their pain treatment. The expectations that these patients held of PCPs could be met regardless of providers' ability to successfully relieve chronic pain.
Keywords: chronic pain; mixed methods; primary care relationship; treatment satisfaction.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
Communication Among Team Members Within the Patient-centered Medical Home and Patient Satisfaction With Providers: The Mediating Role of Patient-Provider CommunicationSE Stockdale et al. Med Care 56 (6), 491-496. PMID 29683867.PCMH environments with better communication among team members are likely to experience better patient-provider communication and high patient satisfaction. PCMH practice …
Evidence Brief: The Quality of Care Provided by Advanced Practice NursesE McCleery et al. PMID 27606392. - ReviewIn a policy paper, Newhouse and colleagues state “[o]nce the issue of comparability between APRN care and that delivered by physicians is set aside in favor of an integra …
Factors for Supporting Primary Care Physician Engagement With Patient Apps for Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management That Link to Primary Care: Interview StudyJ Ayre et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 7 (1), e11885. PMID 30664468.This study provided insight into PCP perspectives on a diabetes app integrated with primary care services. This was observed as more than a technological change; PCPs wer …
Team Dynamics, Clinical Work Satisfaction, and Patient Care Coordination Between Primary Care Providers: A Mixed Methods StudyH Song et al. Health Care Manage Rev 42 (1), 28-41. PMID 26545206.Improving primary care team dynamics could improve clinical work satisfaction among PCPs and patient care coordination between PCPs. In addition to improving outcomes tha …
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and RisksCV Preuss et al. PMID 30726003. - ReviewOne of the single most difficult challenges for any prescriber is to distinguish between the legitimate prescription of controlled substances versus the prescription pote …