A single session of brief electrical stimulation enhances axon regeneration through nerve autografts

Abstract

Nerve graft reconstruction of gap defects may result in poor clinical outcomes, particularly with long regeneration distances. Electrical stimulation (ES) of nerves may improve outcomes in such patients. A single session of ES at 20 Hz for 1 h significantly enhances axon regeneration in animals and human subjects after nerve crush or nerve transection and repair. The objectives of this study were to evaluate if ES enhances axon regeneration through nerve grafts and if there is added benefit of a second, delayed session of ES (serial ES) on axon regeneration as compared to a single session only of ES. In female rats, a gap defect was created in the hindlimb common peroneal (CP) nerve and immediately reconstructed with a 10 mm nerve autograft (Experiment 1) or a 20 mm nerve autograft (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, rats were randomized to 1 h of CP nerve ES or sham stimulation. In Experiment 2, rats were randomized to control (sham ES + sham ES), single ES (ES + sham ES), or serial ES (ES + ES), which consisted of an initial 1 h session of either ES or sham stimulation of the CP nerve, followed by a second 1 h session of ES or sham stimulation of the CP nerve 4 weeks later. In both experiments, after a 6 week period of nerve regeneration, CP neurons that had regenerated axons distal to the autograft were retrograde labelled for enumeration, and the CP nerve distal to the autograft was harvested for histomorphometry. In Experiment 1, rats that received CP nerve ES had statistically significantly more motor (p < .05) and sensory (p < .05) neurons that regenerated axons distal to the 10 mm nerve autograft, with more myelinated axons on histomorphometry (p < .001). Similarly, in Experiment 2, significantly more motor (p < .01) and sensory (p < .05) neurons regenerated axons distal to the 20 mm nerve autograft after a single session or two sessions of CP nerve ES. There was no significant difference in the number of regenerated motor or sensory neurons between rats with 20 mm CP nerve autografts receiving either one or two sessions of CP nerve ES (p > .05). In conclusion, a single session of ES enhances axon regeneration following nerve autografting with no added effect of a second, delayed session of ES. These findings support previous studies in animals and humans of the robust effect of a single session of ES in promoting nerve regeneration following injury and repair.

Keywords: Electrical stimulation; Nerve autograft; Nerve graft; Nerve regeneration; Peripheral nerve.