Influence of temperature on intraspecific, unbalanced dyadic contests between crabs

PeerJ. 2019 Oct 23:7:e7845. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7845. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Intraspecific agonistic interactions are widespread across the animal kingdom, with many individual morphological and physiological characteristics playing important roles in the fate of disputes. Additionally, changes to environmental conditions can influence the outcomes of animal contests. The shore crab (Carcinus maenas) is a globally distributed species, present in numerous coastal and estuarine temperate systems around the world. Although shore crabs are highly tolerant to changes in temperature, this parameter has important physiological effects on the species' ecology, while its effects on behavior are not fully understood. Our study aims to investigate how different individual characteristics (such as sex, color morphotype, carapace and chela morphology) and temperature conditions affect the dyadic interactions between shore crabs when disputing food resources. In general, the differences in carapace width between opponents, their sexes, color morphotypes and the temperature conditions interacted and were important predictors of the contest fate. We found that the body size and color morphotype of C. maenas determined the fate of dyadic disputes. However, the higher temperatures disrupted the well-established dominance of the larger red color morphotype individuals. Overall, the agonistic contest results suggest higher plasticity than previously acknowledged.

Keywords: Aggressive behavior; Climate change; Ecology; Morphology; Shore crab.

Grants and funding

This work was supported by a grant from Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway through the EEA Financial Mechanism and the Norwegian Financial Mechanism. This study was also supported by the FCT (Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal) strategic fund UID/Multi/04423/2019. This work has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 677039” project CLIMEFISH. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.