Factors Associated With Optimal Follow-up in Women With BI-RADS 3 Breast Findings
- PMID: 31669081
- PMCID: PMC7509994
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.10.003
Factors Associated With Optimal Follow-up in Women With BI-RADS 3 Breast Findings
Abstract
Objective: Assess rate of and factors associated with optimal follow-up in patients with BI-RADS 3 breast findings.
Methods: This Institutional Review Board-approved, retrospective cohort study, performed at an academic medical center, included all women undergoing breast imaging (ultrasound and mammography) in 2016. Index reports for unique patients with an assessment of BI-RADS 3 (retrieved via natural language processing) comprised the study population. Patient-specific and provider-related features were extracted from the Research Data Warehouse. The Institutional Cancer Registry identified patients diagnosed with breast cancer. Optimal follow-up rate was calculated as patients with follow-up imaging on the same breast 3 to 9 months from the index examination among patients with BI-RADS 3 assessments. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression determined features associated with optimal follow-up. Malignancy rate and time to malignancy detection were recorded.
Results: Among 93,685 breast imaging examinations, 64,771 were from unique patients of which 2,967 had BI-RADS 3 findings (4.6%). Excluding patients with off-site index examinations and those with another breast examination <3 months from the index, 1,125 of 1,511 patients (74%) had optimal follow-up. In univariate and multivariable analysis, prior breast cancer was associated with optimal follow-up; younger age, Hispanic ethnicity, divorced status, and lack of insurance were associated with not having optimal follow-up. Malignancy rate was 0.86%, and mean time to detection was 330 days.
Discussion: Follow-up of BI-RADS 3 breast imaging findings is optimal in only 74% of women. Further interventions to promote follow-up should target younger, unmarried women, those with Hispanic ethnicity, and women without history of breast cancer and without insurance coverage.
Keywords: BI-RADS; breast imaging; follow-up; health disparities; mammography.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The Impact of Mammographic, Radiologist, and Patient Factors on the Likelihood of Probably Benign (BI-RADS 3) Assessment at Diagnostic Mammography.J Breast Imaging. 2024 May 27;6(3):246-253. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbae014. J Breast Imaging. 2024. PMID: 38655858
-
Patient and System Factors Associated With Completed Follow-Up of Probably Benign (BI-RADS 3) Breast Imaging Findings.J Am Coll Radiol. 2023 Sep;20(9):889-901. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.02.028. Epub 2023 Apr 5. J Am Coll Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37023884
-
Disparities Associated With Patient Adherence to BI-RADS 3 Assessment Follow-up Recommendations for Mammography and Ultrasound.J Am Coll Radiol. 2022 Dec;19(12):1302-1309. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.08.011. Epub 2022 Sep 28. J Am Coll Radiol. 2022. PMID: 36182098
-
Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jan. Report No.: 14-05201-EF-3. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jan. Report No.: 14-05201-EF-3. PMID: 26866210 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Current Status and Future of BI-RADS in Multimodality Imaging, From the AJR Special Series on Radiology Reporting and Data Systems.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Apr;216(4):860-873. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.24894. Epub 2021 Feb 24. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021. PMID: 33295802 Review.
Cited by
-
Applying Natural Language Processing to Textual Data From Clinical Data Warehouses: Systematic Review.JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Dec 15;11:e42477. doi: 10.2196/42477. JMIR Med Inform. 2023. PMID: 38100200 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Population-wide evaluation of artificial intelligence and radiologist assessment of screening mammograms.Eur Radiol. 2024 Jun;34(6):3935-3946. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10423-7. Epub 2023 Nov 8. Eur Radiol. 2024. PMID: 37938386 Free PMC article.
-
Natural Language Processing for Breast Imaging: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 14;13(8):1420. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13081420. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37189521 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Improving Health Equity in Adherence to Diagnostic Breast Imaging Workup Recommendations.J Am Coll Radiol. 2022 Dec;19(12):1310-1311. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.07.019. Epub 2022 Oct 5. J Am Coll Radiol. 2022. PMID: 36208840 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Addressing Disparities Related to Access of Multimodality Breast Imaging Services Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Acad Radiol. 2022 Dec;29(12):1852-1860. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.03.017. Epub 2022 Mar 25. Acad Radiol. 2022. PMID: 35562265 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- IOM. National Academies of Medicine. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2015/I.... Last accessed April 2019 2015. - PubMed
-
- (CRICO) CRIC. 2014. CBS Report: Malpractice Risks in the Diagnostic Process2014 October 1, 2015. Available from: http://www.rmfstrategies.com/Clinician-Resources/Article/2014/CBS-Intro?....
-
- Gandhi TK, Kachalia A, Thomas EJ, Puopolo AL, Yoon C, Brennan TA, et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: a study of closed malpractice claims. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(7):488–96. - PubMed
-
- Breen N, Yabroff KR, Meissner HI. What proportion of breast cancers are detected by mammography in the United States? Cancer Detect Prev. 2007;31(3):220–4. - PubMed
-
- Lacquement MA, Mitchell D, Hollingsworth AB. Positive predictive value of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;189(1):34–40. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
