The coupling of the M2 muscarinic receptor to its G protein is voltage dependent

PLoS One. 2019 Oct 31;14(10):e0224367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224367. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) participate in the majority of signal transduction processes in the body. Specifically, the binding of an external agonist promotes coupling of the GPCR to its G protein and this, in turn, induces downstream signaling. Recently, it was shown that agonist binding to the M2 muscarinic receptor (M2R) and to other GPCRs is voltage dependent. Here we examine, whether the coupling of the M2R to its G protein is also voltage-dependent. We first show, in Xenopus oocytes, that the activity of the M2R in the absence of agonist (constitutive activity) can be used to report the coupling. We then show that the coupling is, by itself, voltage dependent. This novel finding is of physiological importance, as it shows that the actual signal transduction, whose first step is the coupling of the GPCR to its cognate G protein, is voltage dependent.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Acetylcholine / pharmacology
  • Animals
  • Binding Sites
  • G Protein-Coupled Inwardly-Rectifying Potassium Channels / metabolism*
  • GTP-Binding Proteins / metabolism
  • Ion Channel Gating / drug effects
  • Membrane Potentials / drug effects
  • Muscarinic Agonists / pharmacology
  • Oocytes
  • Patch-Clamp Techniques
  • Receptor, Muscarinic M2 / metabolism*
  • Receptor, Muscarinic M2 / physiology
  • Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled / metabolism*
  • Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled / physiology
  • Signal Transduction / drug effects
  • Xenopus Proteins
  • Xenopus laevis

Substances

  • G Protein-Coupled Inwardly-Rectifying Potassium Channels
  • Muscarinic Agonists
  • Receptor, Muscarinic M2
  • Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled
  • Xenopus Proteins
  • GTP-Binding Proteins
  • Acetylcholine

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Israel Science Foundation grant no. 606-15 to YBC and HP. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.