Structure related to function: prefrontal surface area has an indirect effect on the relationship between amygdala volume and trait neuroticism
- PMID: 31673773
- DOI: 10.1007/s00429-019-01974-x
Structure related to function: prefrontal surface area has an indirect effect on the relationship between amygdala volume and trait neuroticism
Abstract
Trait neuroticism refers to individual differences in negative emotional response to threat, frustration, or loss, operationally defined by elevated levels of irritability, anger, sadness, anxiety, worry, hostility, self-consciousness, and vulnerability to mental and physical difficulties. While functional studies have been fairly consistent when identifying regions associated with neuroticism during emotional stimuli, structural imagining studies do not tend to find a relationship between amygdala volume and trait neuroticism. There is a great deal of functional evidence that frontoparietal areas are related to the amygdala, and to emotional reactivity more generally, as a function of their involvement in emotion regulation. Specifically, top-down emotion appraisal and expression appear to involve parts of the dorsolateral and dorsomedial prefrontal cortices, which operate at least in part via the indirect modulation of the amygdala. It was hypothesized that cortical surface area and cortical thickness in regions associated with emotion appraisal/expression and emotional attention (i.e., superior frontal and rostral middle frontal gyri, respectively) would have an indirect effect on the relationship between amygdala volume and self-reported neuroticism (respectively), potentially explaining the inconsistency in the structural literature. In sample of 1106 adults, superior frontal and rostral middle frontal gyri, as parcellated by Freesurfer, were examined as potentially restricting variance in a model of indirect effects, which may elucidate the overall relationship between cortical and subcortical gray matter volume and trait neuroticism. Results indicated that, despite no association between bilateral amygdala volume and trait neuroticism, when right superior frontal surface area was entered into the model of indirect effects, a significant relationship between amygdala volume and trait neuroticism emerged. Two of the three remaining models indicated that cortical surface area had an indirect effect on the relationship between amygdala volume and trait neuroticism. These findings highlight the relationship between structural and functional neuroimaging studies. Specifically, the results indicate that when volume is related to behavior, individual differences in higher-order cortical regions, particularly surface area, may help to better understand the relationship between emotion and subcortical gray matter volume.
Keywords: Amygdala volume; Emotion regulation; Neuroticism; Pre-frontal cortex.
Similar articles
-
Trait neuroticism and emotion neurocircuitry: Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for a failure in emotion regulation.Dev Psychopathol. 2019 Aug;31(3):1085-1099. doi: 10.1017/S0954579419000610. Epub 2019 Jun 3. Dev Psychopathol. 2019. PMID: 31156078 Free PMC article.
-
Trait self-consciousness predicts amygdala activation and its functional brain connectivity during emotional suppression: an fMRI analysis.Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 8;7(1):117. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00073-3. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 28273918 Free PMC article.
-
Individual differences in neuroticism personality trait in emotion regulation.J Affect Disord. 2020 Mar 15;265:468-474. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.086. Epub 2020 Jan 23. J Affect Disord. 2020. PMID: 32090774
-
Cortical and Subcortical Gray Matter Volume in Youths With Conduct Problems: A Meta-analysis.JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;73(1):64-72. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2423. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016. PMID: 26650724 Review.
-
Emotion, cognition, and mental state representation in amygdala and prefrontal cortex.Annu Rev Neurosci. 2010;33:173-202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135256. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2010. PMID: 20331363 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Gender Differences Are Encoded Differently in the Structure and Function of the Human Brain Revealed by Multimodal MRI.Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Jul 21;14:244. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00244. eCollection 2020. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 32792927 Free PMC article.
-
Gray matter structures associated with neuroticism: A meta-analysis of whole-brain voxel-based morphometry studies.Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Jun 15;42(9):2706-2721. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25395. Epub 2021 Mar 11. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021. PMID: 33704850 Free PMC article.
-
The interplay of personality traits, anxiety, and depression in Chinese college students: a network analysis.Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 3;11:1204285. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1204285. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37601217 Free PMC article.
-
Gray-Matter Morphometry of Internalizing-Symptom Dimensions During Adolescence.Clin Psychol Sci. 2022 Sep;10(5):941-959. doi: 10.1177/21677026211071091. Epub 2022 Mar 15. Clin Psychol Sci. 2022. PMID: 36211328 Free PMC article.
-
Trait and state anxiety are mapped differently in the human brain.Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 6;10(1):11112. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68008-z. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32632158 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
