While animal products are rich in protein, the adequacy of dietary protein intake from vegetarian/vegan diets has long been controversial. In this review, we examine the protein and amino acid intakes from vegetarian diets followed by adults in western countries and gather information in terms of adequacy for protein and amino acids requirements, using indirect and direct data to estimate nutritional status. We point out that protein-rich foods, such as traditional legumes, nuts and seeds, are sufficient to achieve full protein adequacy in adults consuming vegetarian/vegan diets, while the question of any amino acid deficiency has been substantially overstated. Our review addresses the adequacy in changes to protein patterns in people newly transitioning to vegetarian diets. We also specifically address this in older adults, where the issues linked to the protein adequacy of vegetarian diets are more complex. This contrasts with the situation in children where there are no specific concerns regarding protein adequacy because of their very high energy requirements compared to those of protein. Given the growing shifts in recommendations from nutrition health professionals for people to transition to more plant-based, whole-food diets, additional scientific evidence-based communications confirming the protein adequacy of vegetarian and vegan diets is warranted.
Keywords: adequacy; adults; amino acids; protein; protein intake; protein requirement; vegan diet; vegetarian diet.
Conflict of interest statement
F.M. is the scientific leader of a research contract with Terres Univia, the French Interbranch organization for plant oils and proteins, for which he receives no fee. The authors declares no other conflict of interest.
Position of the American Dietetic Association: vegetarian diets.J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Jul;109(7):1266-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.05.027. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009. PMID: 19562864
Protein/energy ratios of current diets in developed and developing countries compared with a safe protein/energy ratio: implications for recommended protein and amino acid intakes.Public Health Nutr. 2004 May;7(3):387-405. doi: 10.1079/PHN2003545. Public Health Nutr. 2004. PMID: 15153271 Review.
Health effects of vegetarian and vegan diets.Proc Nutr Soc. 2006 Feb;65(1):35-41. doi: 10.1079/pns2005481. Proc Nutr Soc. 2006. PMID: 16441942 Review.
Position paper on vegetarian diets from the working group of the Italian Society of Human Nutrition.Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Dec;27(12):1037-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2017.10.020. Epub 2017 Oct 31. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2017. PMID: 29174030 Review.
Position of the American Dietetic Association and Dietitians of Canada: Vegetarian diets.J Am Diet Assoc. 2003 Jun;103(6):748-65. doi: 10.1053/jada.2003.50142. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003. PMID: 12778049
- Dagnelie P.C., Mariotti F. Vegetarian diets: Definitions and pitfalls in interpreting literature on health effects of vegetarianism. In: Mariotti F., editor. Vegetarian and Plant-Based Diets in Health and Disease Prevention. Academic Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 2017. pp. 3–10. - DOI
- Lee L., Simpson I. Are we Eating Less Meat? A British Social Attitudes Report. NatCen Social Research; London, UK: 2016.
- Tavoularis G., Sauvage E. Les Nouvelles Générations Transforment la Consommation de Viande. Centre de Recherche pour l’Étude et l’Observation des Conditions de Vie; Paris, France: 2018.
- De Gavelle E., Davidenko O., Fouillet H., Delarue J., Darcel N., Huneau J.F., Mariotti F. Self-Declared attitudes and beliefs regarding protein sources are a good prediction of the degree of transition to a low-meat diet in France. Appetite. 2019;142:104345. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104345. - DOI - PubMed
- Sobiecki J.G., Appleby P.N., Bradbury K.E., Key T.J. High compliance with dietary recommendations in a cohort of meat eaters, fish eaters, vegetarians, and vegans: Results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-Oxford study. Nutr. Res. 2016;36:464–477. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2015.12.016. - DOI - PMC - PubMed