Introduction: Insomnia is associated with a number of adverse consequences that place a substantial economic burden on individuals and society. Cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is a promising intervention that can improve outcomes in people who suffer from insomnia. However, evidence of its cost-effectiveness remains unclear. In this study, we will systematically review studies that report on economic evaluations of CBT-I and investigate the potential economic benefit of CBT-I as a treatment for insomnia.
Methods and analysis: The search will include studies that use full economic evaluation methods (ie, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, cost-benefit, cost-consequences and cost-minimisation analysis) and those that apply partial economic evaluation approaches (ie, cost description, cost-outcome description and cost analysis). We will conduct a preliminary search in MEDLINE, Google Scholar, MedNar and ProQuest dissertation and theses to build the searching terms. A full search strategy using all identified keywords and index terms will then be undertaken in several databases including MEDLINE, Psychinfo, Proquest, Cochrane, Scopus, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science and EMBASE. We will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for protocol guidelines in this review. Only articles in the English language and those reporting on adult populations will be included. We will use standardised data extraction tools for economic evaluations to retrieve and synthesise information from selected studies into themes and summarised in a Joanna Briggs Institute dominance ranking matrix.
Ethics and dissemination: No formal ethics approval will be required as we will not be collecting primary data. Review findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, workshops, conference presentations and a media release.
Prospero registration number: CRD42019133554.
Keywords: CBT-I; adult; economic evaluation; insomnia; systematic review.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Impact of patient's health-related quality of life on physicians' therapy and perceived benefit in acute coronary syndromes: protocol for a systemic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 27;9(2):e026595. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026595. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 30819712 Free PMC article.
Health economic evaluation in orthotics and prosthetics: a systematic review protocol.Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 27;8(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1066-9. Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31248460 Free PMC article.
Economic evaluation of manual therapy for musculoskeletal diseases: a protocol for a systematic review and narrative synthesis of evidence.BMJ Open. 2016 May 13;6(5):e010556. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010556. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 27178973 Free PMC article.
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home-based, nurse-led health promotion for older people: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(20):1-72. doi: 10.3310/hta16200. Health Technol Assess. 2012. PMID: 22490205 Free PMC article. Review.
The effectiveness of ayurvedic oil-based nasal instillation (Nasya) medicines in the treatment of facial paralysis (Ardita): a systematic review.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):198-228. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2402. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27532316 Review.
- American Academy of Sleep Medicine International classification of sleep disorders. 3rd edn Darien, IL: American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2014.
- Chung K-F, Yeung W-F, Ho FY-Y, et al. Cross-Cultural and comparative epidemiology of insomnia: the diagnostic and statistical manual (DSM), International classification of diseases (ICD) and international classification of sleep disorders (ICSD). Sleep Med 2015;16:477–82. 10.1016/j.sleep.2014.10.018 - DOI - PubMed