Practices, Perceptions, and Attitudes in the Evaluation of Critically Ill Children for Bacteremia: A National Survey
- PMID: 31702704
- PMCID: PMC6942229
- DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002176
Practices, Perceptions, and Attitudes in the Evaluation of Critically Ill Children for Bacteremia: A National Survey
Abstract
Objectives: Sending blood cultures in children at low risk of bacteremia can contribute to a cascade of unnecessary antibiotic exposure, adverse effects, and increased costs. We aimed to describe practice variation, clinician beliefs, and attitudes about blood culture testing in critically ill children.
Design: Cross-sectional electronic survey.
Setting: Fifteen PICUs enrolled in the Blood Culture Improvement Guidelines and Diagnostic Stewardship for Antibiotic Reduction in Critically Ill Children collaborative, an investigation of blood culture use in critically ill children in the United States.
Subjects: PICU clinicians (bedside nurses, resident physicians, fellow physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and attending physicians).
Interventions: None.
Measurement and main results: Survey items explored typical blood culture practices, attitudes and beliefs about cultures, and potential barriers to changing culture use in a PICU setting. Fifteen of 15 sites participated, with 347 total responses, 15-45 responses per site, and an overall median response rate of 57%. We summarized median proportions and interquartile ranges of respondents who reported certain practices or beliefs: 86% (73-91%) report that cultures are ordered reflexively; 71% (61-77%) do not examine patients before ordering cultures; 90% (86-94%) obtain cultures for any new fever in PICU patients; 33% (19-61%) do not obtain peripheral cultures when an indwelling catheter is in place; and 64% (36-81%) sample multiple (vs single) lumens of central venous catheters for new fever. When asked about barriers to reducing unnecessary cultures, 80% (73-90%) noted fear of missing sepsis. Certain practices (culture source and indication) varied by clinician type. Obtaining surveillance cultures and routinely culturing all possible sources (each lumen of indwelling catheters and peripheral specimens) are positively correlated with baseline blood culture rates.
Conclusions: There is variation in blood culture practices in the PICU. Fear and reflexive habits are common drivers of cultures. These practices may contribute to over-testing for bacteremia. Further investigation of how to optimize blood culture use is warranted.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
Obtaining Blood Cultures in Critically Ill Children: The Need for a Cultural Change.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Jan;21(1):107-108. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002178. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 31899757 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Blood Cultures Drawn From Arterial Catheters Are Reliable for the Detection of Bloodstream Infection in Critically Ill Children.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 May;19(5):e213-e218. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001462. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018. PMID: 29406376
-
Association of Diagnostic Stewardship for Blood Cultures in Critically Ill Children With Culture Rates, Antibiotic Use, and Patient Outcomes: Results of the Bright STAR Collaborative.JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Jul 1;176(7):690-698. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.1024. JAMA Pediatr. 2022. PMID: 35499841 Free PMC article.
-
Association of a Clinical Practice Guideline With Blood Culture Use in Critically Ill Children.JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Feb 1;171(2):157-164. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3153. JAMA Pediatr. 2017. PMID: 27942705
-
Blood Culture Utilization in the Hospital Setting: a Call for Diagnostic Stewardship.J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Mar 16;60(3):e0100521. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01005-21. Epub 2021 Jul 14. J Clin Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 34260274 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Best Clinical Practice: Blood Culture Utility in the Emergency Department.J Emerg Med. 2016 Nov;51(5):529-539. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Sep 14. J Emerg Med. 2016. PMID: 27639424 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of a Comprehensive Algorithm for PICU Patients With New Fever or Instability: Association of Clinical Decision Support With Testing Practices.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2024 Nov 1;25(11):998-1004. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003582. Epub 2024 Jul 19. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2024. PMID: 39028215
-
Antibiotic Exposure of Critically Ill Children at a Tertiary Care Paediatric Intensive Care Unit in Switzerland.Children (Basel). 2024 Jun 15;11(6):731. doi: 10.3390/children11060731. Children (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38929310 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of Blood Culture Use in Critically Ill Children: A Multicenter Qualitative Study.Pediatr Qual Saf. 2023 Apr 10;8(2):e647. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000647. eCollection 2023 Mar-Apr. Pediatr Qual Saf. 2023. PMID: 37051407 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Stewardship in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2022 Mar;36(1):203-218. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2021.11.003. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2022. PMID: 35168711 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Numbers and narratives: how qualitative methods can strengthen the science of paediatric antimicrobial stewardship.JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022 Jan 22;4(1):dlab195. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlab195. eCollection 2022 Mar. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022. PMID: 35098126 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Hartman ME, Linde-Zwirble WT, Angus DC, et al. Trends in the epidemiology of pediatric severe sepsis. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2013;14(7):686–693. - PubMed
-
- Children’s Hospital Association. Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes (IPSO) is successfully challenging sepsis. Available at: https://www.childrenshospitals.org/sepsiscollaborative. Accessed June 11, 2019.
-
- Hsiao A, Baker M. Fever in the new millennium: a review of recent studies of markers of serious bacterial infection in febrile children. Current Opin Pediatr 2005; 17(1), 56–61 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
