Perceptions of waived juvenile defendants across mental health diagnoses and demographic characteristics

Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Sep-Oct:66:101474. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101474. Epub 2019 Jul 25.

Abstract

Justice involved youth who present with diagnosable mental health issues are commonly prosecuted in criminal courts. Limited research has examined how jurors perceive and respond to transferred juveniles with mental health issues. For the current study, 252 mock jurors were randomly assigned to read one of six profiles (i.e., White male, White female, Black male, Black female, Latino, and Latina) and report culpability, deserved punishment, behavior regulation, and dangerousness for juveniles diagnosed with conduct disorder, major depressive disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, schizophrenia, and described with antisocial traits/behaviors. A schizophrenia diagnosis was associated with less blame, punishment, and capacity for behavior regulation. A description of antisocial traits/behaviors was associated with more blame, punishment, capacity for behavior regulation, and dangerousness. White juveniles described with antisocial traits were considered more blameworthy and deserving of punishment than Latinos. Considering the temporary nature of adolescent antisocial personality characteristics, jurors should have greater awareness of the maturation process.

Keywords: Gender; Juror decision-making; Juvenile offenders; Mental health; Race.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Decision Making*
  • Demography
  • Ethnicity / psychology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Juvenile Delinquency / psychology*
  • Male
  • Mental Disorders / psychology*
  • Punishment / psychology
  • Random Allocation
  • Social Perception*
  • United States