Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr;58(4):636-646.
doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.09.029. Epub 2019 Nov 7.

Emergency Ultrasound Literature and Adherence to Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Criteria

Molly Thiessen  1 , Jody A Vogel  1 , Richard L Byyny  1 , Emily Hopkins  2 , Jason S Haukoos  3 , John L Kendall  1 , Stacy A Trent  1
Affiliations

Emergency Ultrasound Literature and Adherence to Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Criteria

Molly Thiessen et al. J Emerg Med. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Given the wide usage of emergency point-of-care ultrasound (EUS) among emergency physicians (EPs), rigorous study surrounding its accuracy is essential. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) criteria were established to ensure robust reporting methodology for diagnostic studies. Adherence to the STARD criteria among EUS diagnostic studies has yet to be reported.

Objectives: Our objective was to evaluate a body of EUS literature shortly after STARD publication for its baseline adherence to the STARD criteria.

Methods: EUS studies in 5 emergency medicine journals from 2005-2010 were evaluated for their adherence to the STARD criteria. Manuscripts were selected for inclusion if they reported original research and described the use of 1 of 10 diagnostic ultrasound modalities designated as "core emergency ultrasound applications" in the 2008 American College of Emergency Physicians Ultrasound Guidelines. Literature search identified 307 studies; of these, 45 met inclusion criteria for review.

Results: The median STARD score was 15 (interquartile range [IQR] 12-17), representing 60% of the 25 total STARD criteria. The median STARD score among articles that reported diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher than those that did not report accuracy (17 [IQR 15-19] vs. 11 [IQR 9-13], respectively; p < 0.0001). Seventy-one percent of articles met ≥50% of the STARD criteria (56-84%) and 4% met >80% of the STARD criteria.

Conclusions: Significant opportunities exist to improve methodological reporting of EUS research. Increased adherence to the STARD criteria among diagnostic EUS studies will improve reporting and improve our ability to compare outcomes.

Keywords: STARD; diagnostic accuracy; emergency medicine; point-of-care ultrasound; research methodology; standards for the reporting of diagnostic accuracy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of selected articles.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
STARD criteria for articles that reported diagnostic accuracy.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
STARD Criteria for articles that did not report diagnostic accuracy.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lijmer JG. Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests. JAMA 1999;282(11):1061. - PubMed
    1. Mower WR. Evaluating bias and variability in diagnostic test reports. Ann Emerg Med 1999;33(1):85–91. - PubMed
    1. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem 2003;49(1):7–18. - PubMed
    1. Policy Statement: Emergency Ultrasound Guidelines. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2009;53(4):550–70. - PubMed
    1. Reid MC, Lachs MS, Feinstein AR. Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good. JAMA 1995;274(8):645–51. - PubMed