Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 1;35(11):730-736.
doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20191010-03.

Corneal Viscous Properties Cannot Be Determined From Air-Puff Applanation

Corneal Viscous Properties Cannot Be Determined From Air-Puff Applanation

Mathew Francis et al. J Refract Surg. .

Abstract

Purpose: To assess whether corneal viscous properties are measureable with air-puff applanation in patients.

Methods: The study had 312 normal eyes, 107 fellow eyes of patients with keratoconus, and 289 keratoconic eyes. The Corvis ST (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) deformation data for all eyes were analyzed using two models. First, a standard linear solid model (SLM) assumed the cornea was an elastic material only. Second, a two-compartment Kelvin-Voigt model (KVM) assumed the cornea was a visco-elastic material. Corneal stiffness and viscosity were calculated. Further, the deflection amplitude was phase shifted virtually relative to the air-puff applanation force to assess whether the KVM was capable of detecting corneal viscous properties from air-puff applanation. This was similar in concept to measured viscoelastic deformations in other soft tissues. The hysteresis area was also calculated with deformation (cornea and whole globe) and deflection (cornea only) amplitude. The greater the magnitude of the hysteresis area, the greater was the magnitude of corneal viscosity (µc).

Results: Both the SLM and KVM reported similar magnitudes of corneal stiffnesses (correlation coefficient > 0.99). However, for a given model, corneal stiffness was significantly different between normal, fellow, and keratoconic eyes (P = .001). From the KVM, the corneal viscosity was different between groups (P = .001) but was small in magnitude (order of 10-9). The deflection hysteresis area was also small in magnitude (order of 10-6). In contrast, the KVM detected significant corneal viscosity only when the deflection amplitude was virtually phase shifted with respect to the air-puff applanation force.

Conclusions: No significant corneal viscous response was detected in patients who had air-puff applanation. [J Refract Surg. 2019;35(11):730-736.].

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Can the Corvis ST Estimate Corneal Viscoelasticity?
    Abass A, Roberts CJ, Lopes B, Eliasy A, Vinciguerra R, Ambrósio R Jr, Vinciguerra P, Elsheikh A. Abass A, et al. J Refract Surg. 2020 May 1;36(5):346-347. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20200212-04. J Refract Surg. 2020. PMID: 32396647 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources