Neural bases of self- and object-motion in a naturalistic vision

Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Mar;41(4):1084-1111. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24862. Epub 2019 Nov 11.

Abstract

To plan movements toward objects our brain must recognize whether retinal displacement is due to self-motion and/or to object-motion. Here, we aimed to test whether motion areas are able to segregate these types of motion. We combined an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment, brain mapping techniques, and wide-field stimulation to study the responsivity of motion-sensitive areas to pure and combined self- and object-motion conditions during virtual movies of a train running within a realistic landscape. We observed a selective response in MT to the pure object-motion condition, and in medial (PEc, pCi, CSv, and CMA) and lateral (PIC and LOR) areas to the pure self-motion condition. Some other regions (like V6) responded more to complex visual stimulation where both object- and self-motion were present. Among all, we found that some motion regions (V3A, LOR, MT, V6, and IPSmot) could extract object-motion information from the overall motion, recognizing the real movement of the train even when the images remain still (on the screen), or moved, because of self-movements. We propose that these motion areas might be good candidates for the "flow parsing mechanism," that is the capability to extract object-motion information from retinal motion signals by subtracting out the optic flow components.

Keywords: area V6; brain mapping; fMRI; flow parsing; optic flow; wide-field.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Brain Mapping / methods*
  • Cerebral Cortex / diagnostic imaging
  • Cerebral Cortex / physiology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Kinesthesis / physiology*
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Male
  • Motion Perception / physiology*
  • Nerve Net / diagnostic imaging
  • Nerve Net / physiology*
  • Optic Flow / physiology*
  • Virtual Reality
  • Young Adult