Effect of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on temporary threshold shifts in auditory sensitivity. II. Dependence on the level of temporary threshold shifts
- PMID: 3171642
- DOI: 10.1152/jn.1988.60.2.569
Effect of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on temporary threshold shifts in auditory sensitivity. II. Dependence on the level of temporary threshold shifts
Abstract
1. This report presents a more detailed examination of crossed olivocochlear bundle (COCB) effects on temporary threshold shifts (TTS). The principal aim was to establish the details of the relationship between the effects of continuous COCB stimulation and the TTS caused by various exposures. Initially, in various groups, different intensities of a 1-min exposure were presented with or without COCB stimulation. Stimulation at any particular rate caused greatest reductions in TTS to occur for the higher intensity exposures than for the lower intensity ones. Thus COCB stimulation at 140 pulses/s reduced maximum threshold losses by the following amounts: 13.33 [106 dB sound pressure level (SPL) exposure], 13.29 (103 dB SPL exposure), 8.9 (101 dB SPL exposure), and 0.77 dB (97 dB SPL exposure). 2. The effect of COCB stimulation was also examined on a shorter duration (30 s) exposure causing TTS intermediate between that due to 1-min exposure at 97 dB SPL and that at 101 dB SPL. Reductions in TTS to the shorter duration exposure were not obtained with COCB stimulation at 140 pulses/s but only when the rate was increased to 260/s. 3. Thus COCB stimulation at any particular rate caused greatest reductions in TTS when the exposure would have caused a large amount of TTS, regardless of the intensity or duration of exposure. These two parameters of the exposure could be traded to provide a level of TTS that would be affected by a standard COCB stimulus. Low-level exposures that caused only small amounts of TTS were not affected by the standard COCB stimulus. As the level of the exposure, and therefore, the ensuing TTS, increased (with increased duration or intensity of exposure), the standard stimulus had greater effects. Increasing the rate of pulses in the COCB stimulus resulted in the low-level exposures now being affected. Even at the higher rate, greatest reductions in TTS were obtained when the exposure would have resulted in high levels of TTS. 4. In an attempt to determine the site of action of the continuous COCB stimulus the endocochlear potential (EP) and the summating potential (SP) were recorded from scala media of the basal turn while applying COCB stimuli similar to those used in the TTS experiments. Although the continuous COCB stimulus caused the traditional changes in the EP and SP associated with COCB stimulation with pulsed short electrical trains, these changes adapted quite rapidly and did not persist for the amount of time shown to be necessary for full reductions in TTS to be obtained.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Similar articles
-
Effect of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on temporary threshold shifts in auditory sensitivity. I. Dependence on electrical stimulation parameters.J Neurophysiol. 1988 Aug;60(2):549-68. doi: 10.1152/jn.1988.60.2.549. J Neurophysiol. 1988. PMID: 3171641
-
Binaural acoustic stimulation exercises protective effects at the cochlea that mimic the effects of electrical stimulation of an auditory efferent pathway.Brain Res. 1988 Sep 6;459(2):241-55. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(88)90640-3. Brain Res. 1988. PMID: 3179705
-
Electrical stimulation of cochlear efferents at the round window reduces auditory desensitization in guinea pigs. II. Dependence on level of temporary threshold shifts.Hear Res. 1988 Oct;36(1):75-88. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(88)90138-4. Hear Res. 1988. PMID: 3198522
-
A four-state kinetic model of the temporary threshold shift after loud sound based on inactivation of hair cell transduction channels.Hear Res. 1998 Nov;125(1-2):39-70. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(98)00127-0. Hear Res. 1998. PMID: 9833962 Review.
-
The olivocochlear system and protection from acoustic trauma: a mini literature review.Front Syst Neurosci. 2015 Jun 22;9:94. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00094. eCollection 2015. Front Syst Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 26157366 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Chronic Conductive Hearing Loss Leads to Cochlear Degeneration.PLoS One. 2015 Nov 18;10(11):e0142341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142341. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26580411 Free PMC article.
-
Old mice lacking high-affinity nicotine receptors resist acoustic trauma.Hear Res. 2011 Jul;277(1-2):184-91. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.01.009. Epub 2011 Jan 25. Hear Res. 2011. PMID: 21272629 Free PMC article.
-
Diverse responses of single auditory afferent fibres to electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus in guinea-pig.Exp Brain Res. 2005 Jan;160(2):235-44. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-2003-1. Epub 2004 Aug 12. Exp Brain Res. 2005. PMID: 15309356
-
Contralateral Suppression of Transient-evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Leisure Noise Exposed Individuals.Noise Health. 2022 Jul-Sep;24(114):145-150. doi: 10.4103/nah.nah_17_21. Noise Health. 2022. PMID: 36124523 Free PMC article.
-
Protection from acoustic trauma is not a primary function of the medial olivocochlear efferent system.J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2003 Dec;4(4):445-65. doi: 10.1007/s10162-002-3013-y. Epub 2003 Jun 6. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2003. PMID: 12784134 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
