Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr;29(4):320-328.
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009422. Epub 2019 Nov 13.

Work systems analysis of sterile processing: decontamination

Affiliations

Work systems analysis of sterile processing: decontamination

Myrtede Alfred et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Few studies have explored the work of sterile processing departments (SPD) from a systems perspective. Effective decontamination is critical for removing organic matter and reducing microbial levels from used surgical instruments prior to disinfection or sterilisation and is delivered through a combination of human work and supporting technologies and processes.

Objective: In this paper we report the results of a work systems analysis that sought to identify the complex multilevel interdependencies that create performance variation in decontamination and identify potential improvement interventions.

Methods: The research was conducted at a 700-bed academic hospital with two reprocessing facilities decontaminating approximately 23 000 units each month. Mixed methods, including 56 hours of observations of work as done, formal and informal interviews with relevant stakeholders and analysis of data collected about the system, were used to iteratively develop a process map, task analysis, abstraction hierarchy and a variance matrix.

Results: We identified 21 different performance shaping factors, 30 potential failures, 16 types of process variance, and 10 outcome variances in decontamination. Approximately 2% of trays were returned to decontamination from assembly, while decontamination problems were found in about 1% of surgical cases. Staff knowledge, production pressures, instrument design, tray composition and workstation design contributed to outcomes such as reduced throughput, tray defects, staff injuries, increased inventory and equipment costs, and patient injuries.

Conclusions: Ensuring patients and technicians' safety and efficient SPD operation requires improved design of instruments and the decontamination area, skilled staff, proper equipment maintenance and effective coordination of reprocessing tasks.

Keywords: human factors; infection control; nosocomial infections; patient safety; quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hierarchical task analysis for instrument decontamination.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Abstraction hierarchy for instrument cleaning task in decontamination. IFU, instructions for use; OR, operating room; SOP, standard operating procedure; SPD, sterile processing department.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preventing healthcare-associated infections Available: http://www.cdc.gov/washington/~cdcatWork/pdf/infections.pdf [Accessed 30 Sep 2016].
    1. Magill SS, Hellinger W, Cohen J, et al. Prevalence of healthcare-associated infections in acute care hospitals in Jacksonville, Florida. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:283–91. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Magill SS, Edwards JR, Bamberg W, et al. Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care-associated infections. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1198–208. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenblatt K. More than 3,000 patients at new Jersey surgery center possibly exposed to HIV, hepatitis; 2018.
    1. Dancer SJ, Stewart M, Coulombe C, et al. Surgical site infections linked to contaminated surgical instruments. J Hosp Infect 2012;81:231–8. - PubMed

Publication types