Early Surgery or Conservative Care for Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis
- PMID: 31733181
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1912846
Early Surgery or Conservative Care for Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis
Abstract
Background: The timing and indications for surgical intervention in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis remain controversial.
Methods: In a multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 145 asymptomatic patients with very severe aortic stenosis (defined as an aortic-valve area of ≤0.75 cm2 with either an aortic jet velocity of ≥4.5 m per second or a mean transaortic gradient of ≥50 mm Hg) to early surgery or to conservative care according to the recommendations of current guidelines. The primary end point was a composite of death during or within 30 days after surgery (often called operative mortality) or death from cardiovascular causes during the entire follow-up period. The major secondary end point was death from any cause during follow-up.
Results: In the early-surgery group, 69 of 73 patients (95%) underwent surgery within 2 months after randomization, and there was no operative mortality. In an intention-to-treat analysis, a primary end-point event occurred in 1 patient in the early-surgery group (1%) and in 11 of 72 patients in the conservative-care group (15%) (hazard ratio, 0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01 to 0.67; P = 0.003). Death from any cause occurred in 5 patients in the early-surgery group (7%) and in 15 patients in the conservative-care group (21%) (hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.90). In the conservative-care group, the cumulative incidence of sudden death was 4% at 4 years and 14% at 8 years.
Conclusions: Among asymptomatic patients with very severe aortic stenosis, the incidence of the composite of operative mortality or death from cardiovascular causes during the follow-up period was significantly lower among those who underwent early aortic-valve replacement surgery than among those who received conservative care. (Funded by the Korean Institute of Medicine; RECOVERY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01161732.).
Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Comment in
-
Timing of Intervention in Aortic Stenosis.N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 9;382(2):191-193. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1914382. Epub 2019 Nov 16. N Engl J Med. 2020. PMID: 31733179 No abstract available.
-
Early aortic valve surgery reduces mortality.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020 Feb;17(2):72. doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0316-9. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 31792405 No abstract available.
-
Early Surgery or Conservative Care for Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis.N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 2;383(1):91-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2016167. N Engl J Med. 2020. PMID: 32609993 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Conservative Treatment in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: The AVATAR Trial.Circulation. 2022 Mar;145(9):648-658. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057639. Epub 2021 Nov 13. Circulation. 2022. PMID: 34779220 Clinical Trial.
-
Aortic valve replacement vs. conservative treatment in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: long-term follow-up of the AVATAR trial.Eur Heart J. 2024 Nov 8;45(42):4526-4535. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae585. Eur Heart J. 2024. PMID: 39217448 Clinical Trial.
-
Early surgery versus conventional treatment in asymptomatic very severe aortic stenosis.Circulation. 2010 Apr 6;121(13):1502-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.909903. Epub 2010 Mar 22. Circulation. 2010. PMID: 20308614
-
Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement for Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Single Technology Assessment of Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve [Internet].Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Aug 25. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-01. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Aug 25. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-01. PMID: 29553663 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Meta-analysis of the impact of intervention versus symptom-driven management in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis.Heart. 2017 Feb 15;103(4):268-272. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309830. Epub 2016 Aug 18. Heart. 2017. PMID: 27540178 Review.
Cited by
-
Contemporary diagnosis and treatment of valvular heart disease in Korea: a nationwide hospital-based registry study.J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Nov 22;32(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s44348-024-00036-z. J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024. PMID: 39574207 Free PMC article.
-
Transcatheter Procedure Versus Surgical Interventions for Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Contemporary Evaluation Against Conservative Management.Cureus. 2024 Oct 19;16(10):e71859. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71859. eCollection 2024 Oct. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39559653 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in Chinese patients with intermediate and high surgical risk for aortic stenosis: a decision analysis on effect, affordability and cost-effectiveness.BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 18;14(11):e082283. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082283. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39557556 Free PMC article.
-
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Latest Advances and Prospects.J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 1;13(21):6583. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216583. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39518721 Free PMC article.
-
Early Intervention in Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis and Myocardial Fibrosis: The EVOLVED Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2024 Oct 28:e2422730. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.22730. Online ahead of print. JAMA. 2024. PMID: 39466640
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources