Background: Little is known about how team processes impact providers' abilities to prepare patients for a safe hospital discharge. Teamwork Shared Mental Models (teamwork-SMMs) are the teams' organised understanding of individual member's roles, interactions and behaviours needed to perform a task like hospital discharge. Teamwork-SMMs are linked to team effectiveness in other fields, but have not been readily investigated in healthcare. This study examines teamwork-SMMs to understand how interprofessional teams coordinate care when discharging patients.
Methods: This mixed methods study examined teamwork-SMMs of inpatient interprofessional discharge teams at a single hospital. For each discharge event, we collected data from the patient and their discharge team (nurse, physician and coordinator) using interviews and questionnaires. We quantitatively determined the discharge teams' teamwork-SMM components of quality and convergence using the Shared Mental Model Scale, and then explored their relationships to patient-reported preparation for posthospital care. We used qualitative thematic analysis of narrative cases to examine the contextual differences of discharge teams with higher versus lower teamwork-SMMs.
Results: The sample included a total of 106 structured patient interviews, 192 provider day-of-discharge questionnaires and 430 observation hours to examine 64 discharge events. We found that inpatient teams with better teamwork-SMMs (ie, higher perceptions of teamwork quality or greater convergence) were more effective at preparing patients for post-hospital care. Additionally, teams with high and low teamwork-SMMs had different experiences with team cohesion, communication openness and alignment on the patient situation.
Conclusions: Examining the quality and agreement of teamwork-SMMs among teams provides a better understanding of how teams coordinate care and may facilitate the development of specific team-based interventions to improve patient care at hospital discharge.
Keywords: decision making; organizational theory; teams; teamwork; transitions in care.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Interprofessional Team Member's Satisfaction: A Mixed Methods Study of a Chilean HospitalP Espinoza et al. Hum Resour Health 16 (1), 30. PMID 29996936.Results have the potential to contribute to the planning and decision-making in the field of human resources, providing elements to promote the management of health teams …
Are We on the Same Page? Shared Mental Models to Support Clinical Teamwork Among Health Professions Learners: A Scoping ReviewLC Floren et al. Acad Med 93 (3), 498-509. PMID 29028635. - ReviewIn health professions education, the SMM construct lacks clear definition. Few studies described educational interventions aimed at SMM development, and few attempted to …
Conceptualizing Interprofessional Teams as Multi-Team Systems-Implications for Assessment and TrainingC West et al. Teach Learn Med 27 (4), 366-9. PMID 26507993.Multidimensional, competency-based instruments appear to provide a robust view of IPE teamwork; however, challenges remain. Due to the large scale of the simulation exerc …
Teamwork Skills, Shared Mental Models, and Performance in Simulated Trauma Teams: An Independent Group DesignHK Westli et al. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 18, 47. PMID 20807420.The present study replicates and extends previous research by providing new empirical evidence of the significance of specific teamwork skills and a shared mental model f …
Does Team Reflexivity Impact Teamwork and Communication in Interprofessional Hospital-Based Healthcare Teams? A Systematic Review and Narrative SynthesisSK McHugh et al. BMJ Qual Saf. PMID 31911544. - ReviewThe reviewed literature suggests that VRE is well placed to provide more locally appropriate solutions to contributory patient safety factors, ranging from individual and …