Objective: The recurrence rate after colorectal surgery for endometriosis is up to 50% at 5 years. The aim of the current review and meta-analysis was to assess recurrence associated with shaving, disc excision, and segmental resection for endometriosis with colorectal involvement.
Data sources: A systematic review was performed by searching the PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for publications before February 28, 2019, using the terms "colorectal endometriosis" and "recurrence" in English. The outcome measure was histologically proven recurrence 1 year after the index surgery.
Methods of study selection: Studies rated as good or fair by a study quality assessment tool were included. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of the studies; discrepancies were discussed, and if a consensus was not reached, a third reviewer was consulted.
Tabulation, integration, and results: Of 156 relevant published trials, 41 were systematically reviewed and 4 were included in the meta-analysis. The risk of recurrence was higher after rectal shaving than after both segmental resection (odds ratio [OR], 5.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.33-13.12; I2 = 0%; p = .001) and disc excision for histologically proven recurrence (OR, 3.83; 95% CI, 1.33-11.05; I2 = 0%; p = .01). This difference was not significant when comparing disc excision with segmental resection (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 0.8-8.65; I2 = 0%; p = .11).
Conclusion: The current analysis shows that the risk of recurrence is lower when segmental resection or disc excision is performed than when rectal shaving is performed. This finding is important when deciding the most appropriate surgical management.
Keywords: Disc excision; Reappearance; Segmental resection; Shaving.
Copyright © 2019 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.