Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1916454.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.16454.

Association of Patient and Visit Characteristics With Rate and Timing of Urologic Procedures for Patients Discharged From the Emergency Department With Renal Colic

Elizabeth M Schoenfeld  1   2 , Meng-Shiou Shieh  2 , Penelope S Pekow  2   3 , Charles D Scales Jr  4 , James M Munger  1 , Peter K Lindenauer  2   5   6
Affiliations

Association of Patient and Visit Characteristics With Rate and Timing of Urologic Procedures for Patients Discharged From the Emergency Department With Renal Colic

Elizabeth M Schoenfeld et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Little is known about the timing of urologic interventions in patients with renal colic discharged from the emergency department. Understanding patients' likelihood of a subsequent urologic intervention could inform decision-making in this population.

Objectives: To examine the rate and timing of urologic procedures performed after an emergency department visit for renal colic and the factors associated with receipt of an intervention.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study used the Massachusetts All Payers Claims Database to identify patients 18 to 64 years of age who were seen in a Massachusetts emergency department for renal colic from January 1, 2011, to October 31, 2014, Patients were identified via International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes, and all medical care was linked, enabling identification of subsequent health care use. Data analysis was performed from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018.

Main outcomes and measures: The main outcome was receipt of urologic procedure within 60 days. Secondary outcomes included rates of return emergency department visit and urologic and primary care follow-up.

Results: A total of 66 218 unique index visits by 55 314 patients (mean [SD] age, 42.6 [12.4] years; 33 590 [50.7%] female; 25 411 [38.4%] Medicaid insured) were included in the study. A total of 5851 patients (8.8%) had visits resulting in admission at the index encounter, and 1774 (2.7%) had visits resulting in a urologic procedure during that admission. Of the 60 367 patient visits resulting in discharge from the emergency department, 3018 (5.0%) led to a urologic procedure within 7 days, 4407 (7.3%) within 14 days, 5916 (9.8%) within 28 days, and 7667 (12.7%) within 60 days. A total of 3226 visits (5.3%) led to a subsequent emergency department visit within 7 days and 6792 (11.3%) within 60 days. For the entire cohort (admitted and discharged patients), 39 189 (59.2%) had contact with a urologist or primary care practitioner within 60 days. Having Medicaid-only insurance was associated with lower rates of urologic procedures (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66-0.74) and urologic follow-up (5.6% vs 8.8%; P < .001) and higher rates of primary care follow-up (59.2% vs 47.2%; P < .001) compared with patients with all other insurance types.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, most adult patients younger than 65 years who were discharged from the emergency department with a diagnosis of renal colic did not undergo a procedure or see a urologist within 60 days. This finding has implications for both the emergency department and outpatient treatment of these patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Schoenfeld reported receiving grants from Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality during the conduct of the study. Dr Scales reported receiving personal fees from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality during the conduct of the study and grants from Allena Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flow of Included Patients
ED indicates emergency department.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Time From the Index Emergency Department (ED) Visit to Intervention for the Entire Cohort and Those Initially Discharged
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Time From the Index Emergency Department (ED) Visit to Intervention for Discharged Patients With Medicaid-Only Insurance vs All Other Insurance Types
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Scales CD Jr, Tasian GE, Schwaderer AL, Goldfarb DS, Star RA, Kirkali Z. Urinary stone disease: advancing knowledge, patient care, and population health. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11(7):-. doi:10.2215/CJN.13251215 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schoenfeld EM, Pekow PS, Shieh M-S, Scales CD Jr, Lagu T, Lindenauer PK. The diagnosis and management of patients with renal colic across a sample of us hospitals: high CT utilization despite low rates of admission and inpatient urologic intervention. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0169160. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169160 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caldwell N, Srebotnjak T, Wang T, Hsia R. “How much will I get charged for this?” patient charges for top ten diagnoses in the emergency department. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55491-e55496. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055491 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elder JW, Delgado MK, Chung BI, Pirrotta EA, Wang NE. Variation in the intensity of care for patients with uncomplicated renal colic presenting to U.S. emergency departments. J Emerg Med. 2016;51(6):628-635. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.05.037 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Papa L, Stiell IG, Wells GA, Ball I, Battram E, Mahoney JE. Predicting intervention in renal colic patients after emergency department evaluation. CJEM. 2005;7(2):78-86. doi:10.1017/S1481803500013026 - DOI - PubMed