Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 3 (23), 3829-3866

American Society of Hematology 2019 Guidelines for Immune Thrombocytopenia

Affiliations

American Society of Hematology 2019 Guidelines for Immune Thrombocytopenia

Cindy Neunert et al. Blood Adv.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Despite an increase in the number of therapies available to treat patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), there are minimal data from randomized trials to assist physicians with the management of patients.

Objective: These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in their decisions about the management of ITP.

Methods: In 2015, ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included 8 adult clinical experts, 5 pediatric clinical experts, 2 methodologists with expertise in ITP, and 2 patient representatives. The panel was balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The panel reviewed the ASH 2011 guideline recommendations and prioritized questions. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including evidence-to-decision frameworks, to appraise evidence (up to May 2017) and formulate recommendations.

Results: The panel agreed on 21 recommendations covering management of ITP in adults and children with newly diagnosed, persistent, and chronic disease refractory to first-line therapy who have non-life-threatening bleeding. Management approaches included: observation, corticosteroids, IV immunoglobulin, anti-D immunoglobulin, rituximab, splenectomy, and thrombopoietin receptor agonists.

Conclusions: There was a lack of evidence to support strong recommendations for various management approaches. In general, strategies that avoided medication side effects were favored. A large focus was placed on shared decision-making, especially with regard to second-line therapy. Future research should apply standard corticosteroid-dosing regimens, report patient-reported outcomes, and include cost-analysis evaluations.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: All authors were members of the guideline panel or members of the systematic review team or both. As such, they completed disclosure-of-interest forms, which were reviewed by ASH and are available as supplemental Files 2 and 3.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Algorithm for the selection of second-line therapy in adults with ITP. Selection of second-line therapy in adults with ITP should be individualized based on duration of disease and patient values and preferences. Other factors that may influence treatment decisions include frequency of bleeding sufficient to require hospitalization or rescue medication, comorbidities, compliance, medical and social support networks, cost, and availability of treatments. Patient education and shared decision-making is encouraged. Patient characteristics are shown in blue boxes, actions in yellow boxes, and treatment options in red boxes. Numbered recommendations corresponding to each treatment option are provided.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 2 articles

Feedback