Similar articles

• Using Patient Preferences to Determine Noninferiority Margins in Trials

  EJ Feuer et al. JAMA 322 (21), 2137-2138. 2019. PMID 31794620.
• Comparison of Noninferiority Margins Reported in Protocols and Publications Showed Incomplete and Inconsistent Reporting

  OM Dekkers et al. J Clin Epidemiol 68 (5), 510-7. May 2015. PMID 25450451.

  The reporting of noninferiority margins was incomplete and inconsistent with study protocols in a substantial proportion of published trials, and margins were rarely repo …
• A Novel Approach to Noninferiority Testing: Documented Proof Rather Than Arbitrary Margins

  TJ Cleophas et al. Am J Ther 19 (2), 101-7. Mar 2012. PMID 20975529.

  Noninferiority trials have been criticized for their wide margins of noninferiority, making it virtually impossible to reject noninferiority. Recommendations have been gi …
• Statistical Issues and Recommendations for Noninferiority Trials in Oncology: A Systematic Review

  S Tanaka et al. Clin Cancer Res 18 (7), 1837-47. 2012. PMID 22317762. - Review

  To provide an overview of noninferiority trials in oncology with a special emphasis on methodologic issues, we conducted a systematic review of randomized trials assessin …
• Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: A Scoping Review

  SM Joy et al. Pharmacoeconomics 31 (10), 877-92. Oct 2013. PMID 24081453. - Review

  This study provides the first systematic evaluation of the methods used in the broad existing body of research into patient preferences for type 2 diabetes medications an …