Standalone smartphone apps for mental health-a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 31815193
- PMCID: PMC6889400
- DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0188-8
Standalone smartphone apps for mental health-a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
While smartphone usage is ubiquitous, and the app market for smartphone apps targeted at mental health is growing rapidly, the evidence of standalone apps for treating mental health symptoms is still unclear. This meta-analysis investigated the efficacy of standalone smartphone apps for mental health. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in February 2018 on randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of standalone apps for mental health in adults with heightened symptom severity, compared to a control group. A random-effects model was employed. When insufficient comparisons were available, data was presented in a narrative synthesis. Outcomes included assessments of mental health disorder symptom severity specifically targeted at by the app. In total, 5945 records were identified and 165 full-text articles were screened for inclusion by two independent researchers. Nineteen trials with 3681 participants were included in the analysis: depression (k = 6), anxiety (k = 4), substance use (k = 5), self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (k = 4), PTSD (k = 2), and sleep problems (k = 2). Effects on depression (Hedges' g = 0.33, 95%CI 0.10-0.57, P = 0.005, NNT = 5.43, I 2 = 59%) and on smoking behavior (g = 0.39, 95%CI 0.21-0.57, NNT = 4.59, P ≤ 0.001, I 2 = 0%) were significant. No significant pooled effects were found for anxiety, suicidal ideation, self-injury, or alcohol use (g = -0.14 to 0.18). Effect sizes for single trials ranged from g = -0.05 to 0.14 for PTSD and g = 0.72 to 0.84 for insomnia. Although some trials showed potential of apps targeting mental health symptoms, using smartphone apps as standalone psychological interventions cannot be recommended based on the current level of evidence.
Keywords: Human behaviour; Outcomes research; Psychology.
© The Author(s) 2019.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interestsD.D.E. has served as a consultant to/on the scientific advisory boards of Sanofi, Novartis, Minddistrict, Lantern, Schoen Kliniken, Ideamed and German health insurance companies (BARMER, Techniker Krankenkasse) and a number of federal chambers for psychotherapy. D.D.E. and M.B. are also stakeholders of the Institute for Health Training Online (GET.ON), which aims to implement scientific findings related to digital health interventions into routine care. The rest of the authors declare that there are no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Efficacy of Self-Management Smartphone-Based Apps for Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Front Neurosci. 2020 Jan 24;14:3. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00003. eCollection 2020. Front Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 32038153 Free PMC article.
-
Digital Health Technologies for Long-term Self-management of Osteoporosis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Apr 21;10(4):e32557. doi: 10.2196/32557. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022. PMID: 35451968 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current evidence on the efficacy of mental health smartphone apps for symptoms of depression and anxiety. A meta-analysis of 176 randomized controlled trials.World Psychiatry. 2024 Feb;23(1):139-149. doi: 10.1002/wps.21183. World Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38214614 Free PMC article.
-
Smartphone Apps for the Treatment of Mental Disorders: Systematic Review.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 2;8(4):e14897. doi: 10.2196/14897. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020. PMID: 32238332 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mobile Apps That Promote Emotion Regulation, Positive Mental Health, and Well-being in the General Population: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Nov 8;8(11):e31170. doi: 10.2196/31170. JMIR Ment Health. 2021. PMID: 34747713 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Attrition in Conversational Agent-Delivered Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2024 Feb 27;26:e48168. doi: 10.2196/48168. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 38412023 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of the internet-based intervention "Selfapy" in participants with unipolar depression and the impact on quality of life: a randomized, parallel group study.Qual Life Res. 2024 Feb 25. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03606-2. Online ahead of print. Qual Life Res. 2024. PMID: 38403818
-
Predicting Adverse Behavior in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder Through Off-body Sleep Analysis.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Jan 24:2024.01.23.24301681. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.23.24301681. medRxiv. 2024. PMID: 38343835 Free PMC article. Preprint.
-
Effects on voice hearing distress and social functioning of unguided application of a smartphone app - A randomized controlled trial.Internet Interv. 2024 Jan 26;35:100717. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100717. eCollection 2024 Mar. Internet Interv. 2024. PMID: 38328276 Free PMC article.
-
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia Self-Management Mobile Apps: A Review of Efficacy and Quality.J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2024 Jan 28. doi: 10.1007/s10880-023-09992-y. Online ahead of print. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2024. PMID: 38281307
References
-
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Key Substance Use and Mental Health Indicators in the United States: Results from the 2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (2016).
-
- Richards D, Richardson T, Timulak L, McElvaney J. The efficacy of internet-delivered treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Internet Interv. 2015;2:272–282. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2015.07.003. - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
