Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb;46(2):87-98.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.11.003. Epub 2019 Dec 16.

What Are the Determinants of Health System Performance? Findings from the Literature and a Technical Expert Panel

Review

What Are the Determinants of Health System Performance? Findings from the Literature and a Technical Expert Panel

M Susan Ridgely et al. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Background: The US health care system is the most expensive in the world, but it lags behind many other industrialized nations on multiple measures of effectiveness and quality. This poor performance may have played a role in the push to incentivize health care organizations to achieve high performance over a range of domains. Research is needed to understand the determinants of health system performance.

Methods: To identify key attributes of health systems associated with performance, a literature review was conducted. The characteristics identified were compiled into a Web-based rating instrument for use with a Technical Expert Panel composed of leaders in health systems and health services research. A modified Delphi process was initiated using three rounds to develop group consensus.

Results: The expert panel reached consensus on nine broad areas important to health system performance. Panelists also rated which specific attributes within those domains were predictive of performance. Panelists tended to rate the kind of characteristics used in past research (such as size, ownership, and profit status) as only somewhat or not at all important, while rating aspects of culture, leadership, and business execution as very important.

Conclusion: There is limited empirical evidence and understanding of factors associated with health system performance. This study illustrates the value of using a modified Delphi process to bring experiential evidence to the task. These findings may help researchers refine their data collection efforts, policy makers craft better policies to incentivize high performance, and health leaders build better systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures

The authors have no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
The literature flow shows how the 56 articles used in the data synthesis were selected.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Shown here are the interrelationships among the various domains that affect health system performance. QI, quality improvement; HIT, health information technology.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schneider EC and Squires D, From Last to First - Could the U.S. Health Care System Become the Best in the World? N Engl J Med, 2017. 377(10): p. 901–904. - PubMed
    1. Baker A, Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. BMJ 2001. 323.7322: p. 1192. - PubMed
    1. Damberg CL, et al., Taking stock of pay-for-performance: a candid assessment from the front lines. Health Aff (Millwood), 2009. 28(2): p. 517–25. - PubMed
    1. Ahluwalia SC, et al., What Defines a High-Performing Health Care Delivery System: A Systematic Review. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 2017. 43(9): p. 450–459. - PMC - PubMed
    1. AHRQ. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Fact Sheet: Comparative Health System Performance Initiative. 2016; Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/chsp/chsp-fact-sheet-07....

Publication types