Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar;68(3):496-504.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.16272. Epub 2019 Dec 16.

Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control in Adults 80 Years or Older: A Secondary Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial

Affiliations

Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control in Adults 80 Years or Older: A Secondary Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial

Nicholas M Pajewski et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) control in older adults with hypertension, considering cognitive and physical function.

Design: Secondary analysis.

Setting: Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) PARTICIPANTS: Adults 80 years or older.

Intervention: Participants with hypertension but without diabetes (N = 1167) were randomized to an SBP target below 120 mm Hg (intensive treatment) vs a target below 140 mm Hg (standard treatment).

Measurements: We measured the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD), mortality, changes in renal function, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), probable dementia, and serious adverse events. Gait speed was assessed via a 4-m walk test, and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was used to quantify baseline cognitive function.

Results: Intensive treatment led to significant reductions in cardiovascular events (hazard ratio [HR] = .66; 95% confidence interval [CI] = .49-.90), mortality (HR = .67; 95% CI = .48-.93), and MCI (HR = .70; 95% CI = .51-.96). There was a significant interaction (P < .001) whereby participants with higher baseline scores on the MoCA derived strong benefit from intensive treatment for a composite of CVD and mortality (HR = .40; 95% CI = .28-.57), with no appreciable benefit in participants with lower scores on the MoCA (HR = 1.33 = 95% CI = .87-2.03). There was no evidence of heterogeneity of treatment effects with respect to gait speed. Rates of acute kidney injury and declines of at least 30% in estimated glomerular filtration rate were increased in the intensive treatment group with no between-group differences in the rate of injurious falls.

Conclusion: In adults aged 80 years or older, intensive SBP control lowers the risk of major cardiovascular events, MCI, and death, with increased risk of changes to kidney function. The cardiovascular and mortality benefits of intensive SBP control may not extend to older adults with lower baseline cognitive function.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01206062. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:496-504, 2020.

Keywords: cardiovascular disease; cognitive function; hypertension; older adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors received support for this work from the NIH. Adam P. Bress receives research support to his institution from Novartis, Amgen, and Amarin. Jordan King has received private consulting income from Novartis and Amarin. Suzanne Oparil reported receipt of personal fees from Actelion Clinical Research, Boehringer Ingelheim/Lilly, Lundbeck, Novo Nordisk, 98point6, George Clinical Pty, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, and ROX Medical, and grant support from Actelion Clinical Research, George Clinical Pty, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis. She also reported work as editor in chief of Current Hypertension Reports (until December 2020), published by Springer Science Business Media, for which she receives an annual stipend of $5000. JeffD. Williamson reported that his institution received funding from Biogen (unrelated to this study).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Systolic blood pressure in the two treatment groups over the course of follow-up. The systolic blood pressure (SBP) target was <120 mm Hg in the Intensive Treatment group, and < 140 mm Hg in the Standard Treatment group. Trial phase includes follow-up through the decision to stop the intervention on August 20, 2015; cohort phase denotes visits that occurred after that date. Points indicate least square means based on linear mixed model with error bars denoting 95% confidence intervals.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ortman JM, Velkoff VA, Hogan H. An Aging Nation: The Older Population in the United States. Current Population Reports. U.S. Census Bureau; 2014. https://www.census.gov/prod/2014pubs/p25-1140.pdf. Accessed July 16, 2019.
    1. Chen V, Ning H, Allen N, et al. Lifetime risks for hypertension by contemporary guidelines in African American and white men and women. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4(5):455–459. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Executive Summary: a Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2018;138(17): e426–e483. - PubMed
    1. Forman DE, Maurer MS, Boyd C, et al. Multimorbidity in older adults with cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(19):2149–2161. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benetos A, Petrovic M, Strandberg T. Hypertension management in older and frail older patients. Circ Res. 2019;124(7):1045–1060. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

Grants and funding