Early Colonoscopy Does Not Improve Outcomes of Patients With Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Systematic Review of Randomized Trials
- PMID: 31843595
- PMCID: PMC7292779
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.11.061
Early Colonoscopy Does Not Improve Outcomes of Patients With Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Systematic Review of Randomized Trials
Abstract
Background & aims: Guidelines recommend colonoscopy evaluation within 24 hours of presentation or admission in patients with high-risk or severe acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB). Meta-analyses of the timing of colonoscopy have relied primarily on observational studies that had major potential for bias. We performed a systematic review of randomized trials to determine optimal timing of colonoscopy for patients hospitalized with acute LGIB.
Methods: We searched publication databases through July 2019 and abstracts from gastroenterology meetings through November 2019 for randomized trials of patients with acute LGIB or hematochezia. We searched for studies that compared early colonoscopy (within 24 hours) with elective colonoscopy beyond 24 hours and/or other diagnostic tests. Our primary outcome was further bleeding, defined as persistent or recurrent bleeding after index examination. Secondary outcomes included mortality, diagnostic yield (identifying source of bleeding), endoscopic intervention, and any primary hemostatic intervention (endoscopic, surgical, or interventional radiologic). We performed dual independent review, data extraction, and risk of bias assessments. We performed the meta-analysis using a random-effects model.
Results: Our final analysis included data from 4 randomized trials. Further bleeding was not decreased among patients who received early vs later, elective colonoscopy (relative risk [RR] for further bleeding with early colonoscopy, 1.57; 95% CI. 0.74-3.31). We did not find significant differences in the secondary outcomes of mortality (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.05-17.21), diagnostic yield (RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.99-1.21), endoscopic intervention (RR, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.67-3.48), or any primary hemostatic intervention (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.92-1.92).
Conclusions: In a meta-analysis of randomized trials, we found that colonoscopy within 24 hours does not reduce further bleeding or mortality in patients hospitalized with acute LGIB. Based on these findings, patients hospitalized with acute LGIB do not generally require early colonoscopy.
Keywords: Comparison; Endoscopy; Intestines; Stomach.
Copyright © 2020 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures: No conflicts of interest Writing Assistance: None
Figures
Similar articles
-
Does Urgent Colonoscopy Improve Outcomes in the Management of Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding?Am J Med Sci. 2017 Mar;353(3):298-306. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2016.11.007. Epub 2016 Nov 8. Am J Med Sci. 2017. PMID: 28262219 Review.
-
Initial management for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 7;25(1):69-84. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i1.69. World J Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 30643359 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Urgent Versus Standard Colonoscopy for Management of Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul;54(6):493-502. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001329. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 32091447
-
The diagnostic yield of urgent colonoscopy in acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2020 Apr-Jun;83(2):265-270. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2020. PMID: 32603045
-
Systematic review with meta-analysis: limited benefits from early colonoscopy in acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Sep;52(5):774-788. doi: 10.1111/apt.15925. Epub 2020 Jul 22. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020. PMID: 32697886
Cited by
-
Empiric embolization by vasospasm therapy for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a preliminary report.Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 28;14(1):25728. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76408-8. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39468181 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Hospital-Acquired Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Single Centre Retrospective Cohort Study.Cureus. 2022 Dec 17;14(12):e32651. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32651. eCollection 2022 Dec. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36654553 Free PMC article.
-
Utility of early colonoscopy for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective cohort study.Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan 10;16:17562848221147757. doi: 10.1177/17562848221147757. eCollection 2023. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2023. PMID: 36644128 Free PMC article.
-
American College of Gastroenterology-Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline: Management of Anticoagulants and Antiplatelets During Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding and the Periendoscopic Period.J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2022 Mar 17;5(2):100-101. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwac010. eCollection 2022 Apr. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 35368325 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessment of Video Capsule Endoscopy in the Management of Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding During the COVID-19 Pandemic.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2118796. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.18796. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34328500 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Laine L, Yang H, Chang SC, et al. Trends for incidence of hospitalization and death due to GI complications in the United States from 2001 to 2009. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107:1190–5. - PubMed
-
- Pasha SF, Shergill A, Acosta RD, et al. The role of endoscopy in the patient with lower GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2014;79:875–85. - PubMed
-
- Sengupta N, Tapper EB, Feuerstein JD. Early Versus Delayed Colonoscopy in Hospitalized Patients With Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Meta-Analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2017;51:352–359. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
