How to Identify Patients Who Are Less Likely to Have Metachronous Neoplasms After a Colon Cancer: A Predictive Model
- PMID: 31858510
- DOI: 10.1055/a-1041-2945
How to Identify Patients Who Are Less Likely to Have Metachronous Neoplasms After a Colon Cancer: A Predictive Model
Abstract
Background: Patients with prior colon cancer have increased risk of metachronous colorectal neoplasms; therefore, endoscopic surveillance is indicated. Current recommendations are not risk-stratified. We investigated predictive factors for colorectal neoplasms to build a model to spare colonoscopies for low-risk patients.
Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective study including patients who underwent surgery for colon cancer in 2001 - 2008 (derivation cohort) and 2009 - 2013 (validation cohort). A predictive model for neoplasm occurrence at second surveillance colonoscopy was developed and validated.
Results: 421 and 203 patients were included in derivation and validation cohort, respectively. At second surveillance colonoscopy, 112 (26.6 %) and 55 (27.1 %) patients had metachronous neoplasms in derivation and validation groups; three cancers were detected in the latter. History of left-sided colon cancer (OR 1.64, 95 %CI 1.02 - 2.64), ≥ 1 advanced adenoma at index colonoscopy (OR 1.90, 95 %CI 1.05 - 3.43), and ≥ 1 adenoma at first surveillance colonoscopy (OR 2.06, 95 %CI 1.29 - 3.27) were independently predictive of metachronous colorectal neoplasms at second surveillance colonoscopy. For patients without such risk factors, diagnostic accuracy parameters were: 89.3 % (95 %CI 82.0 %-94.3 %) and 78.2 % (95 %CI 65.0 %-88.2 %) sensitivity, and 28.5 % (95 %CI 23.5 %-33.9 %) and 33.8 % (95 %CI 26.2 %-42.0 %) specificity in derivation and validation group, respectively. No cancer would be missed.
Conclusions: Patients with prior left-sided colon cancer or ≥ 1 advanced adenoma at index colonoscopy or ≥ 1 adenoma at first surveillance colonoscopy had a significantly higher risk of neoplasms at second surveillance colonoscopy; patients without such factors had much lower risk and could safely skip the second surveillance colonoscopy. A prospective, multicenter validation study is needed.
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Prediction of the Risk of a Metachronous Advanced Colorectal Neoplasm Using a Novel Scoring System.Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Oct;61(10):3016-3025. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4237-8. Epub 2016 Jun 29. Dig Dis Sci. 2016. PMID: 27358228
-
Risk of Metachronous High-Risk Adenomas and Large Serrated Polyps in Individuals With Serrated Polyps on Index Colonoscopy: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.Gastroenterology. 2018 Jan;154(1):117-127.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Sep 18. Gastroenterology. 2018. PMID: 28927878 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors for metachronous adenoma in the residual colon of patients undergoing curative surgery for colorectal cancer.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Nov;32(11):1609-1616. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2881-x. Epub 2017 Aug 21. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017. PMID: 28828520 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence of advanced adenomas at surveillance colonoscopy in patients with a personal history of colon adenomas: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Oct;64(4):614-26. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.06.057. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006. PMID: 16996358 Review.
-
Colonoscopy: a review of its yield for cancers and adenomas by indication.Am J Gastroenterol. 1995 Mar;90(3):353-65. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995. PMID: 7872270 Review.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
