Identifying the 'incredible'! Part 2: Spot the difference - a rigorous risk of bias assessment can alter the main findings of a systematic review
Br J Sports Med
.
2020 Jul;54(13):801-808.
doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101675.
Epub 2019 Dec 23.
Authors
Fionn Büttner
1
,
Marinus Winters
2
,
Eamonn Delahunt
3
4
,
Roy Elbers
5
,
Carolina B Lura
2
,
Karim M Khan
6
,
Adam Weir
7
8
9
,
Clare L Ardern
10
11
12
Affiliations
1
School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland fionn.cleirigh-buttner@ucdconnect.ie.
2
Center for General Practice at Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
3
School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
4
Institute for Sport & Health, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
5
Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
6
Department of Family Practice, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
7
Sports Groin Pain Centre, Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
8
Department of Orthopaedics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center for Groin Injuries, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
9
Sport Medicine and Exercise Clinic Haarlem (SBK), Haarlem, The Netherlands.
10
Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
11
Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
12
Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
PMID:
31871014
DOI:
10.1136/bjsports-2019-101675
No abstract available
Keywords:
education; methodological; review.
Publication types
Editorial
MeSH terms
Bias*
Checklist
Humans
Research Design / standards
Risk Assessment / methods
Sports Medicine* / standards
Systematic Reviews as Topic*