Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 20 (1), 620

Predicting the Evolution of Neck Pain Episodes in Routine Clinical Practice


Predicting the Evolution of Neck Pain Episodes in Routine Clinical Practice

Francisco M Kovacs et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord.


Background: The objective of this study was to develop models for predicting the evolution of a neck pain (NP) episode.

Methods: Three thousand two hundred twenty-five acute and chronic patients seeking care for NP, were recruited consecutively in 47 health care centers. Data on 37 variables were gathered, including gender, age, employment status, duration of pain, intensity of NP and pain referred down to the arm (AP), disability, history of neck surgery, diagnostic procedures undertaken, imaging findings, clinical diagnosis, and treatments used. Three separate multivariable logistic regression models were developed for predicting a clinically relevant improvement in NP, AP and disability at 3 months.

Results: Three thousand one (93.5%%) patients attended follow-up. For all the models calibration was good. The area under the ROC curve was ≥0.717 for pain and 0.664 for disability. Factors associated with a better prognosis were: a) For all the outcomes: pain being acute (vs. chronic) and having received neuro-reflexotherapy. b) For NP: nonspecific pain (vs. pain caused by disc herniation or spinal stenosis), no signs of disc degeneration on imaging, staying at work, and being female. c) For AP: nonspecific NP and no signs of disc degeneration on imaging. d) For disability: staying at work and no signs of facet joint degeneration on imaging.

Conclusions: A prospective registry can be used for developing valid predictive models to quantify the odds that a given patient with NP will experience a clinically relevant improvement.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart showing the number of patients whose data were included in the regression models
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Nomogram for improvement of neck pain
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Nomogram for improvement of arm pain
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Nomogram for improvement of disability

Similar articles

See all similar articles


    1. Hoy D, March L, Woolf A, Blyth F, Brooks P, Smith E, Vos T, Barendregt J, Blore J, Murray C, Burstein R, Buchbinder R. The global burden of neck pain: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(7):1309–1315. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204431. - DOI - PubMed
    1. GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1545–1602. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31678-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohen SP, Hooten WM. Advances in the diagnosis and management of neck pain. BMJ. 2017;358:j3221. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3221. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kelly J, Ritchie C, Sterling M. Clinical prediction rules for prognosis and treatment prescription in neck pain: a systematic review. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017;27:155–164. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.10.066. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dreyer NA, Garner S. Registries for robust evidence. JAMA. 2009;302:790–791. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1092. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources