Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 27;9(1):19830.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56185-5.

Quantitative MRI Biomarkers of Stereotactic Radiotherapy Outcome in Brain Metastasis

Affiliations

Quantitative MRI Biomarkers of Stereotactic Radiotherapy Outcome in Brain Metastasis

Elham Karami et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

About 20-40% of cancer patients develop brain metastases, causing significant morbidity and mortality. Stereotactic radiation treatment is an established option that delivers high dose radiation to the target while sparing the surrounding normal tissue. However, up to 20% of metastatic brain tumours progress despite stereotactic treatment, and it can take months before it is evident on follow-up imaging. An early predictor of radiation therapy outcome in terms of tumour local failure (LF) is crucial, and can facilitate treatment adjustments or allow for early salvage treatment. In this study, an MR-based radiomics framework was proposed to derive and investigate quantitative MRI (qMRI) biomarkers for the outcome of LF in brain metastasis patients treated with hypo-fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT). The qMRI biomarkers were constructed through a multi-step feature extraction/reduction/selection framework using the conventional MR imaging data acquired from 100 patients (133 lesions), and were applied in conjunction with machine learning techniques for outcome prediction and risk assessment. The results indicated that the majority of the features in the optimal qMRI biomarkers characterize the heterogeneity in the surrounding regions of tumour including edema and tumour/lesion margins. The optimal qMRI biomarker consisted of five features that predict the outcome of LF with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79, and a cross-validated sensitivity and specificity of 81% and 79%, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier analyses showed a statistically significant difference in local control (p-value < 0.0001) and overall survival (p = 0.01). Findings from this study are a step towards using qMRI for early prediction of local failure in brain metastasis patients treated with SRT. This may facilitate early adjustments in treatment, such as surgical resection or salvage radiation, that can potentially improve treatment outcomes. Investigations on larger cohorts of patients are, however, required for further validation of the technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scheme of the radiomics-based outcome prediction framework. (a) The binary masks including the tumour delineated by expert oncologists (A), edema segmented semi-automatically (B), tumour-margin (C), and the lesion-margin (D). (b) Extracting the geometrical and textural features from T1w and T2-FLAIR images within the binary masks. (c) Correlation-based feature reduction (A), and multi-step feature selection (B). (d) Outcome prediction (LC versus LF) using the SVM classifier.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The qMRI feature heat maps. (a) The R-squared heat map generated using the Pearson correlation coefficients for all pairs of the extracted features. (b) The p-value heat maps for different sub-regions of the lesion generated using the Mann-Whitney U test (overall LC versus LF) for each feature after the redundant features were eliminated.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Representative parametric maps of the features in the optimal qMRI biomarker for the overall LC/LF outcome. The parametric maps show the spatial variations in the features derived from the MR images acquired at the baseline and the first follow up for representative tumours with LC (a) and LF (b) outcomes. The mean relative change from the baseline at the first follow up (∆mean) is given for each feature. Biomarker abbreviations: LM-WLHL-G-MaxProb-T2: Lesion-Margin_Wavelet_ILHL_GLCM_MaximumProbability_T2; E-WHHL-H-Max_T2: Edema_Wavelet_IHHL_Histogram_Maximum_T2; T-H-Min-T2: Tumour_Histogram_Minimum_T2; TM-WHLH-H-Min-T2: Tumour-Margin _Wavelet_IHLH_Histogram_Minimum_T2; LM-WHLL-H-Range-T2: Lesion-Margin _Wavelet_IHLL_Histogram_Range_T2.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The Kaplan-Meier clinical local control and survival curves. The tumours were categorized into two cohorts based on the overall (a), 6-month (b), and 12-month (c) LC/LF predicted outcome at the first follow up (Cohort 1: predicted as LC; Cohort 2: predicted as LF using the qMRI optimal biomarkers). A patient was categorized into the LF cohort when they have one tumour with an overall (d), 6-month (e), and 12-month (f) LF predicted outcome at the first follow up.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ostrom QT, Wright CH, Barnholtz-Sloan JS. Brain metastases: epidemiology. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. 2018;149:3–23. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-811161-1.00001-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Greenspoon JN, et al. Comparative survival in patients with brain metastases from Non-Small-Cell lung cancer treated before and after implementation of radiosurgery. Curr. Oncol. 2017;24:e146–e151. doi: 10.3747/co.24.3420. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. D’Andrea G, Palombi L, Minniti G, Pesce A, Marchetti P. Brain Metastases: Surgical Treatment and Overall Survival. World Neurosurg. 2017;97:169–177. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.09.054. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Soliman, H., Das, S., Larson, D. A. & Sahgal, A. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the modern management of patients with brain metastases. Oncotarget7 (2016). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tsao M, Xu W, Sahgal A. A meta-analysis evaluating stereotactic radiosurgery, whole-brain radiotherapy, or both for patients presenting with a limited number of brain metastases. Cancer. 2012;118:2486–93. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26515. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding