Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Jan 2;382(1):51-59.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1901383.

Changes in Quality of Care after Hospital Mergers and Acquisitions

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Changes in Quality of Care after Hospital Mergers and Acquisitions

Nancy D Beaulieu et al. N Engl J Med. .

Abstract

Background: The hospital industry has consolidated substantially during the past two decades and at an accelerated pace since 2010. Multiple studies have shown that hospital mergers have led to higher prices for commercially insured patients, but research about effects on quality of care is limited.

Methods: Using Medicare claims and Hospital Compare data from 2007 through 2016 on performance on four measures of quality of care (a composite of clinical-process measures, a composite of patient-experience measures, mortality, and the rate of readmission after discharge) and data on hospital mergers and acquisitions occurring from 2009 through 2013, we conducted difference-in-differences analyses comparing changes in the performance of acquired hospitals from the time before acquisition to the time after acquisition with concurrent changes for control hospitals that did not have a change in ownership.

Results: The study sample included 246 acquired hospitals and 1986 control hospitals. Being acquired was associated with a modest differential decline in performance on the patient-experience measure (adjusted differential change, -0.17 SD; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.26 to -0.07; P = 0.002; the change was analogous to a fall from the 50th to the 41st percentile) and no significant differential change in 30-day readmission rates (-0.10 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.53 to 0.34; P = 0.72) or in 30-day mortality (-0.03 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.20 to 0.14; P = 0.72). Acquired hospitals had a significant differential improvement in performance on the clinical-process measure (0.22 SD; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.38; P = 0.03), but this could not be attributed conclusively to a change in ownership because differential improvement occurred before acquisition.

Conclusions: Hospital acquisition by another hospital or hospital system was associated with modestly worse patient experiences and no significant changes in readmission or mortality rates. Effects on process measures of quality were inconclusive. (Funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Differences in Performance between Acquired Hospitals and Control Hospitals before and after Acquisition.
The difference in adjusted performance between acquired hospitals and control hospitals is plotted for each year relative to the transaction year, with error bars denoting 95% confidence intervals.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Health care services acquisition report. Norwalk, CT: Irving Levin Associates, 2007–2016. (https://www.levinassociates.com/).
    1. Fulton BD. Health care market concentration trends in the United States: evidence and policy responses. Health Aff (Millwood) 2017; 36: 1530–8. - PubMed
    1. The impact of hospital consolidation — update. Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, June 2012.
    1. Gaynor M, Ho K, Town RJ. The industrial organization of health-care markets. J Econ Lit 2015; 53: 235–84.
    1. Cooper Z, Craig SV, Gaynor M, Van Reenen J. The price ain’t right? Hospital prices and health spending on the privately insured. Q J Econ 2019; 134: 51–107. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types