Purpose of review: Miniaturization was the major trend in percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the past 15 years, aiming to lower tract-size-related complication rates while maintaining good stone-free-rates (SFR). Although there is some evidence that 18 Fr Mini-percutaneous lithotomy (PCNL) has comparable efficacy to conventional PCNL and a lower risk of bleeding, it is less clear whether further miniaturization led to an even better safety profile while maintaining good SFR. The present review evaluates the latest results on efficacy, safety, and feasibility of miniaturized techniques 14 Fr or less in PCNL.
Recent findings: Recent literature of the last 2 years reported outcomes of different systems from 4.85 to 14 Fr. Most of these studies demonstrated good efficacy when comparing with RIRS or conventional PCNL. Limitations were a decrease in SFR for stone sizes more than 2 cm, a longer operative time and the likelihood of pathologic intrarenal pressure (IRP) with a higher risk of postoperative fever or sepsis.
Summary: Miniaturization of PCNL is an innovative approach in order to lower complication rates and hospitalization time for therapy of renal stones. Limitations like longer OR time or higher IRP may limit the benefit of super miniaturized systems. Currently, the 18 Fr Mini-PCNL seems to be the most reliable solution for stones up to 25 mm, whereas RIRS remains the first choice in renal stones less than 10 mm.
Different Tract Sizes of Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Endourol. 2017 Nov;31(11):1101-1110. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0547. Epub 2017 Oct 30. J Endourol. 2017. PMID: 28950716 Review.
Tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower calyceal stones of ⩽2 cm: A prospective randomised controlled study.Arab J Urol. 2016 Nov 29;15(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2016.10.002. eCollection 2017 Mar. Arab J Urol. 2016. PMID: 28275516 Free PMC article.
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Urol. 2015 Jan;67(1):125-137. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Jul 23. Eur Urol. 2015. PMID: 25064687 Review.
Mini- versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of pediatric renal stones: is smaller enough?J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Dec;15(6):664.e1-664.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Sep 16. J Pediatr Urol. 2019. PMID: 31604603
Retrograde intrarenal surgery vs miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy to treat lower pole renal stones 1.5-2.5 cm in diameter.World J Clin Cases. 2018 Dec 6;6(15):931-935. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i15.931. World J Clin Cases. 2018. PMID: 30568948 Free PMC article.