Nurses' and auxiliary nurse midwives' adherence to essential birth practices with peer coaching in Uttar Pradesh, India: a secondary analysis of the BetterBirth trial

Implement Sci. 2020 Jan 3;15(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0962-7.


Background: The BetterBirth trial tested the effect of a peer coaching program around the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist for birth attendants in primary-level facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India on a composite measure of perinatal and maternal mortality and maternal morbidity. This study aimed to examine the adherence to essential birth practices between two different cadres of birth attendants-nurses and auxiliary nurse midwives (ANMs)-during and after a peer coaching intervention for the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist.

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of birth attendant characteristics, coaching visits, and behavior uptake during the BetterBirth trial through birth attendant surveys, coach observations, and independent observations. Descriptive statistics were calculated overall, and by staffing cadre (staff nurses and ANMs) for demographic characteristics. Logistic regression using the Pearson overdispersion correction (to account for clustering by site) was used to assess differences between staff nurses and ANMs in the intervention group during regular coaching (2-month time point) and 4 months after the coaching program ended (12-month time point).

Results: Of the 570 birth attendants who responded to the survey in intervention and control arms, 474 were staff nurses (83.2%) and 96 were ANMs (16.8%). In the intervention arm, more staff nurses (240/260, 92.3%) received coaching at all pause points compared to ANMs (40/53, 75.5%). At baseline, adherence to practices was similar between ANMs and staff nurses (~ 30%). Overall percent adherence to essential birth practices among ANMs and nurses was highest at 2 months after intervention initiation, when frequent coaching visits occurred (68.1% and 64.1%, respectively, p = 0.76). Practice adherence tapered to 49.2% among ANMs and 56.1% among staff nurses at 12 months, which was 4 months after coaching had ended (p = 0.68).

Conclusions: Overall, ANMs and nurses responded similarly to the coaching intervention with the greatest increase in percent adherence to essential birth practices after 2 months of coaching and subsequent decrease in adherence 4 months after coaching ended. While coaching is an effective strategy to support some aspects of birth attendant competency, the structure, content, and frequency of coaching may need to be customized according to the birth attendant training and competency.

Trial registration: NCT2148952; Universal Trial Number: U1111-1131-5647.

Trial registration: NCT02148952.

Keywords: Birth attendant; Childbirth; Coaching; Competency; Uttar Pradesh.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Checklist / standards
  • Delivery, Obstetric / standards*
  • Female
  • Guideline Adherence
  • Humans
  • India / epidemiology
  • Logistic Models
  • Maternal Mortality / trends
  • Mentoring / organization & administration*
  • Middle Aged
  • Midwifery / standards*
  • Nurses / standards*
  • Peer Group*
  • Perinatal Mortality / trends
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • World Health Organization

Associated data