Out-Of-Pocket Spending For Maternity Care Among Women With Employer-Based Insurance, 2008-15
- PMID: 31905056
- DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00296
Out-Of-Pocket Spending For Maternity Care Among Women With Employer-Based Insurance, 2008-15
Abstract
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires employer-based insurance plans to cover maternity services, but plans are allowed to impose cost sharing such as copayments and deductibles for these services. This study aimed to evaluate trends in cost sharing for maternity care among working women in employer-based plans, before and after the ACA. Our data indicate that between 2008 and 2015, average out-of-pocket spending for maternity care rose among women with employer-based insurance. This increase was largely driven by increased spending among women with deductibles. When we controlled for potential confounders, we found that out-of-pocket spending was higher for lower-income working women in 2008-13, but disparities disappeared in 2014-15 because of a continued rise in spending among higher-income working women. Policies that aim to lower out-of-pocket spending for maternity care could reduce a significant financial burden on families.
Keywords: Access and use; Affordable Care Act; Co-payments; Coinsurance; Cost sharing; Costs and spending; Deductibles; Employer-sponsored insurance; Health policy; Maternity care; Out-of-pocket expenses; Payment.
Comment in
-
Out-Of-Pocket Spending For Maternity Care.Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Sep;39(9):1649. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01367. Health Aff (Millwood). 2020. PMID: 32897787 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Employer drug benefit plans and spending on prescription drugs.JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1733-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1733. JAMA. 2002. PMID: 12365957
-
Employer-sponsored insurance: how much financial protection does it provide?Med Care Res Rev. 2002 Dec;59(4):440-54. doi: 10.1177/107755802237810. Med Care Res Rev. 2002. PMID: 12508704
-
Changes in Consumer Cost-Sharing for Health Plans Sold in the ACA's Insurance Marketplaces, 2015 to 2016.Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2016 May;11:1-14. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2016. PMID: 27214926
-
A Critical Analysis of Obamacare: Affordable Care or Insurance for Many and Coverage for Few?Pain Physician. 2017 Mar;20(3):111-138. Pain Physician. 2017. PMID: 28339427 Review.
-
Out-of-Pocket Health Care Expenses for Medical Services, by Insurance Coverage, 2000-2014.2017 Feb. In: Statistical Brief (Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (US)) [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2001–. STATISTICAL BRIEF #500. 2017 Feb. In: Statistical Brief (Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (US)) [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2001–. STATISTICAL BRIEF #500. PMID: 28783273 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Insurance coverage and discontinuity during pregnancy: Frequency and associations documented in the PROMISE cohort.Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr;59(2):e14265. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14265. Epub 2023 Dec 20. Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 38123135
-
Association of Childbirth With Medical Debt.Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jan 1;143(1):11-13. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005381. Epub 2023 Sep 28. Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 37769313
-
Rural-Urban Differences in Health Care Unaffordability During the Postpartum Period.Med Care. 2023 Sep 1;61(9):595-600. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001888. Epub 2023 Aug 10. Med Care. 2023. PMID: 37561603 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and Magnitude of Potential Surprise Bills for Childbirth.JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jul 2;2(7):e211460. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.1460. eCollection 2021 Jul. JAMA Health Forum. 2021. PMID: 35977212 Free PMC article.
-
Catastrophic Health Expenditures With Pregnancy and Delivery in the United States.Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Apr 1;139(4):509-520. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004704. Epub 2022 Mar 10. Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 35271537 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
